Risk assessment in straw-based power generation public-private partnership projects in China: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis

被引:93
|
作者
Wu, Yunna [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lingwenying [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ruhang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kaifeng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Xiaoshan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
PPP mode; Straw-based power generation; Risk assessment; Fuzzy synthetic evaluation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ENERGY PROJECTS; PPP PROJECTS; ALLOCATION; MALAYSIA; SUCCESS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increasing requirement on energy saving, emission reduction and environmental protection in China, the straw-based power generation is developing rapidly, which can not only provide clean energy, but also address the serious environmental problems caused by farmers' burning straw directly. Currently, the government is gradually applying Public-Private-Partnership model to this field making use of private sectors' capital and technological advantages. To assess the risks in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China, 44 risk factors were identified and 19 critical risks factors (CRFs) were selected and classified into 4 groups (CRGs) based on a questionnaire survey in this paper. Then, the likelihood of occurrence (LO), magnitude of impact (MI), the integrated risk level (IRL) of each CRF, CRG and the overall risk were calculated through the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. The CRF "government invention" was the most critical risk factor and the CRG "project participant risk" was the most critical risk factor group. Overall, the final fuzzy synthesis result indicated that the IRL of the public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China was high. Finally, some recommendations were given for each CRF. The evaluation index system, the multi-criteria fuzzy synthetic evaluation framework, the obtained conclusions and the risk response measures in this paper can help policy makers and project decision makers make appropriate decisions and allocate the limited resources to the risks worthy more attention. Simultaneously, this paper can provide a reference for the private sector to avoid too risky project and at the same time facilitate the public sector to take effective measures reducing project risks so as to attract more high-quality private capital. In addition, the risk assessment in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects has not been discussed and paid enough attention yet. Thus, this study expands the knowledge and contributes to the literature. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 990
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of moral hazard and adverse selection of public private partnership projects
    Owusu-Manu, De-Graft
    Kukah, Augustine Senanu Komla
    Edwards, David John
    Ameyaw, Ernest Effah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23 (11) : 1805 - 1814
  • [32] Public Private Partnership to Brownfield Remediation Projects in China: A Combined Risk Evaluation Approach
    Han, Qingye
    Qin, Yan
    Zhang, Heng
    Ke, Ginger Y.
    LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [33] Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Supervision Behavior for Public-Private Partnership Projects with Public Participation
    Li, Congdong
    Li, Xiaoli
    Wang, Yu
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
  • [34] USING FUZZY ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS AND ISM METHODS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: A CHINA PERSPECTIVE
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Xinyu
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (02) : 168 - 183
  • [35] Efficiency Assessment of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects: The Case of Russia
    Berezin, Andrey
    Sergi, Bruno S.
    Gorodnova, Natalia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [36] Assessment of the Critical Dispute Factors in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects
    Gunduz, Murat
    Naji, Khalid K.
    Al-Sharafi, Samar
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [37] Dynamic Assessment of the Transfer Risks in China's Public-Private Partnership Water Projects: A System Dynamics Approach
    Guo, Yubo
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Liu, Linlin
    Chen, Chuan
    Martek, Igor
    Luo, Xiaowei
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2023, 29 (04)
  • [38] Ex Post Risk Management in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects
    Xiong, Wei
    Zhao, Xianbo
    Yuan, Jing-Feng
    Luo, Sai
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 48 (03) : 76 - 89
  • [39] Critical Risks Inherent to the Transfer Phase of Public-Private Partnership Water Projects in China
    Bao, Fengyu
    Martek, Igor
    Chen, Chuan
    Wu, Qihong
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 38 (03)
  • [40] Funding and Finance Analysis of Public-Private Partnership Highway Projects: Exploratory Study
    Fathi, Medya
    Shrestha, Pramen P.
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 13 (03)