Risk assessment in straw-based power generation public-private partnership projects in China: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis

被引:98
作者
Wu, Yunna [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lingwenying [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ruhang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kaifeng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Xiaoshan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
PPP mode; Straw-based power generation; Risk assessment; Fuzzy synthetic evaluation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ENERGY PROJECTS; PPP PROJECTS; ALLOCATION; MALAYSIA; SUCCESS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increasing requirement on energy saving, emission reduction and environmental protection in China, the straw-based power generation is developing rapidly, which can not only provide clean energy, but also address the serious environmental problems caused by farmers' burning straw directly. Currently, the government is gradually applying Public-Private-Partnership model to this field making use of private sectors' capital and technological advantages. To assess the risks in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China, 44 risk factors were identified and 19 critical risks factors (CRFs) were selected and classified into 4 groups (CRGs) based on a questionnaire survey in this paper. Then, the likelihood of occurrence (LO), magnitude of impact (MI), the integrated risk level (IRL) of each CRF, CRG and the overall risk were calculated through the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. The CRF "government invention" was the most critical risk factor and the CRG "project participant risk" was the most critical risk factor group. Overall, the final fuzzy synthesis result indicated that the IRL of the public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects in China was high. Finally, some recommendations were given for each CRF. The evaluation index system, the multi-criteria fuzzy synthetic evaluation framework, the obtained conclusions and the risk response measures in this paper can help policy makers and project decision makers make appropriate decisions and allocate the limited resources to the risks worthy more attention. Simultaneously, this paper can provide a reference for the private sector to avoid too risky project and at the same time facilitate the public sector to take effective measures reducing project risks so as to attract more high-quality private capital. In addition, the risk assessment in public-private partnership straw-based power generation projects has not been discussed and paid enough attention yet. Thus, this study expands the knowledge and contributes to the literature. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 990
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   Turkish experience with public private partnerships in infrastructure: Opportunities and challenges [J].
Emek, Ugur .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 37 :120-129
[12]   Public private partnership projects in Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors [J].
Hwang, Bon-Gang ;
Zhao, Xianbo ;
Gay, Mindy Jiang Shu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (03) :424-433
[13]   Challenges in implementing public private partnership (PPP) in Malaysia [J].
Ismail, Suhaiza ;
Harris, Fatimah Azzahra .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACCOUNTING STUDIES 2014, ICAS 2014, 2014, 164 :5-10
[14]   Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks [J].
Jin, Xiao-Hua ;
Zhang, Guomin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (05) :591-603
[15]   Preferred risk allocation in China's public-private partnership (PPP) projects [J].
Ke, Yongjian ;
Wang, ShouQing ;
Chan, Albert P. C. ;
Lam, Patrick T. I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (05) :482-492
[16]   Offering a framework for evaluating the performance of project risk management system [J].
Khameneh, Amir-Hossein ;
Taheri, Alireza ;
Ershadi, Mahmood .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH IPMA WORLD CONGRESS WC2015, 2016, 226 :82-90
[17]   Risk scorecard concept in wind energy projects: An integrated approach [J].
Kucukali, Serhat .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 :975-987
[18]  
Kumar L, 2017, FINANCIAL RISK ASSES
[19]   Performance evaluation of eco-industrial thermal power plants by using fuzzy GRA-VIKOR and combination weighting techniques [J].
Li, Nana ;
Zhao, Huiru .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 135 :169-183
[20]   Risk analysis in ultra deep scientific drilling project - A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach [J].
Liu, Jia Lin ;
Li, Quanxi ;
Wang, Yuhan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (03) :449-458