Optimal number of baseline sessions before changing phases within single-case experimental designs

被引:6
作者
Barnard-Brak, Lucy [1 ]
Watkins, Laci [1 ]
Richman, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Capital Hall 1807,Box 870232, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, POB 41071, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Baseline; Sessions; Single case; Single subject; SUBJECT RESEARCH; BIAS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104461
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recommendations vary considerably for the minimum or optimal number of baseline sessions to conduct within single-case experimental design clinical analyses or research studies. We examined the optimal number of baseline sessions that produced minimal bias. First, we examined the relation between the number of baseline sessions and the degree of bias in calculating estimates of treatment effect size. As the number of baseline sessions increased, the bias in effect size estimates decreased, r = -0.36, p < 0.001. s, we examined what would be the minimum number of baseline sessions associated with varying levels of bias. Bias of approximately ten percent was associated with four to five baseline sessions. Bias of about five percent was associated with six to seven baseline sessions. Third, we examined the relation between standard deviation and varying levels of bias. As the number of baseline sessions increases, the standard deviation for the phase decreased, r = -0.89, p < 0.001. Fourth, we examined what value of standard deviation in the baseline phase was associated with equal to or more than five versus ten percent bias. When considering five or ten percent bias, the optimal level of standard deviation was 0.59 or less.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, SINGLE CASE RES METH, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315150666
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Procedures and standards handbook (Version 4.0)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, ED510743
  • [5] Detecting rater bias using a person-fit statistic: a Monte Carlo simulation study
    Aubin, Andre-Sebastien
    St-Onge, Christina
    Renaud, Jean-Sebastien
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 7 (02) : 83 - 92
  • [6] BACB (Behavior Analyst Certification Board), 2014, PROF ETH COMPL COD B
  • [7] Single-subject research in rehabilitation: A review of studies using AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, and alternating treatments designs
    Backman, CL
    Harris, SR
    Chisholm, JAM
    Monette, AD
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (10): : 1145 - 1153
  • [8] Development of an in-vivo metric to aid visual inspection of single-case design data: Do we need to run more sessions?
    Barnard-Brak, Lucy
    Richman, David M.
    Little, Todd D.
    Yang, Zhanxia
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2018, 102 : 8 - 15
  • [9] Biosoft, 2004, UNGRAPH WIND VERS 5
  • [10] Bithell C., 1994, Physiotherapy, V80, P85, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(10)61015-2, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(10)61015-2]