One-Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study

被引:22
作者
Sennerby, Lars [1 ]
Andersson, Peter [1 ]
Verrocchi, Damiano [1 ]
Viinamaeki, Rauno [1 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Biomat, Inst Surg Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
clinical follow-up; ental implants; radiography; resonance frequency analysis; two-stage technique; OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANTS; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; DIFFERENT SURFACES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL RATES; BONE; RESPONSES; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available. Purpose: To study the stability and clinical/radiographic outcomes of Neoss implants 1 year of loading when using a two-stage protocol. Materials and Methods: Ninety (90) consecutive patients scheduled for implant treatment using a two-stage procedure were enrolled in a prospective follow-up study. A total of 218 implants (Neoss System, Bimodal surface, Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) in diameters of 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 mm and in lengths from 7 to 15 mm were placed to support 29 single tooth replacements, 53 partial bridges, 5 full bridges, and 10 overdentures in both jaws. Abutment connection was made after a healing period of 34 months. The patients were followed during 1 year of loading with clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis (Osstell Mentor (TM), Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) examinations. Prostheses were removed at the annual check-up for individual testing of implant stability. Results: Three implant failures were experienced, giving a survival rate of 98.6% after 1 year. A mean bone loss of 0.6 mm (SD 0.8) was observed after 1 year. There was a significant inverse correlation between implant diameter and marginal bone loss (p < .003). The mean implant stability quotient levels were 73.7 (SD 7.6), 74.4 (SD 6.4), and 76.7 (SD 5.2) at placement, abutment connection, and first annual check-up, respectively. The stability had increased significantly from placement to 1 year (p < .001) and from abutment to 1 year (p < .0001). Implant stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla at all time points. There was a significant correlation between bone quality and stability at placement (p < .0001) and abutment connection (p < .001) but not after 1 year. Conclusions: The use of Neoss implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of consecutive edentate patients with different needs resulted in predictable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year of loading. Implant stability measurements revealed a favorable bone tissue reaction to the implants.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 320
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (I). Success criteria and epidemiology [J].
Esposito, M ;
Hirsch, JM ;
Lekholm, U ;
Thomsen, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1998, 106 (01) :527-551
[12]  
Friberg B, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V28, P297
[13]  
Friberg Bertil, 2003, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V5, P71, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00186.x
[14]  
Glauser R, 2001, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V3, P204
[15]   Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading -: Successful vs. failing implants [J].
Glauser, R ;
Sennerby, L ;
Meredith, N ;
Rée, A ;
Lundgren, A ;
Gottlow, J ;
Hämmerle, CHF .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (04) :428-434
[16]  
Glauser Roland, 2003, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V5 Suppl 1, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00015.x
[17]   Factors Influencing the Preservation of the Periimplant Marginal Bone [J].
Hermann, Frederic ;
Lerner, Henriette ;
Palti, Ady .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2007, 16 (02) :165-175
[18]  
Ivanoff CJ, 2001, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, P12128
[19]  
Jemt T, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P301
[20]  
Jokstad A, 2008, OSSEINTEGRATION DENT, P3