Influence of multiple gaseous medium injection on low-carbon iron ore sintering performance: Characteristics of natural gas and steam coupling injection

被引:16
作者
Wu, Yufeng [1 ]
Fan, Xiaohui [1 ]
Ji, Zhiyun [1 ]
Gan, Min [1 ]
Tu, Yong [1 ]
Zhao, Gaige [3 ]
Zhou, Haoyu [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Zengqing [1 ]
Chen, Xuling [1 ]
Huang, Xiaoxian [1 ]
Zou, Fanqiu [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Minerals Proc & Bioengn, 932 South Lushan Rd, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] MCC Changtian Int Engn Co LTD, 7 Gongji Rd, Changsha 410221, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Xiang Tan Iron & Steel Co LTD Hunan Valin, 26 xinmiao Rd, Xiangtan 411101, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coupling injection; CO2 emissions reduction; Fuel consumption; Gaseous concentration; Iron ore sintering; NO reduction Pathway; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; SUCTION PRESSURE; FUEL-INJECTION; CHINA IRON; H2O; CO2; OPTIMIZATION; PROPORTION; REDUCTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133907
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrogen-rich gas and steam are widely regarded to be of great potential to mitigate CO(2 )emissions in iron ore sintering, these gases can regulate heat distribution in the sintering machines by replacing fossil fuels. However, most sintering machines only use one of the gases as the injecting medium, the potential of this technology has not been developed. In this paper, a multiple gaseous medium injection method contained natural gas and steam was experimentally investigated to solving this problem. Sintering tests were arranged to study the appropriate scheme of coupling injection and its influence on the sintering process, and the flue gas analyzer was used to detect the composition of the sintering flue gas in real time. Better sintering indexes were achieved by injecting the above two gaseous medium when the coke breeze ratio is unchanged, the results show that when 0.8 vol% natural gas is injected into the 4-14min, 0.15 vol% steam is injected into the 10-14 min, and 0.25 vol% steam is injected into the 15-18 min of sintering, the sintering yield increases by 2.42%, and the tumbler index increases by 2.72%. Under the above parameters, the coke breeze ratio can be reduced by 12.99%, the average NOx emissions decreased by 19.5%, and the average CO emissions decreased by 36.96% in the coupling injection interval (4-18min). After calculating the amount of coke breeze and natural gas in the optimal coupling injection sintering, CO2 emissions decreased by 7.66%, about 17.15 kg/t(-sinter). Moreover, the PFR model was used to simulate the associated gas phase reaction after coupling injection which shows H2O significantly reduced CO emissions and change the reduction pathway of NO. Generally, sintering fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions have also been reduced, providing theoretical support for the change of iron ore sintering energy structure.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Influence of ammonia and Brown gas injection on the iron ore sintering characteristics under biochar substitution
    Lv, Laiquan
    Wang, Jiankang
    Meng, Hanxiao
    Zhou, Hao
    PARTICUOLOGY, 2024, 94 : 16 - 28
  • [2] Investigation into the characteristics of H2-rich gas injection over iron ore sintering process: Experiment and modelling
    Huang, Xiaoxian
    Fan, Xiaohui
    Ji, Zhiyun
    Gan, Min
    Chen, Xuling
    Zhao, Yuanjie
    Jiang, Tao
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 157
  • [3] Numerical Simulation on Influence of Coke Oven Gas Injection on Iron Ore Sintering
    Ni, Wenjie
    Li, Haifeng
    Shao, Lei
    Zou, Zongshu
    ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 60 (04) : 662 - 673
  • [4] Mathematical modeling of natural gas injection in iron ore sintering process and corresponding environmental assessment of CO2 mitigation
    Gao, Qiangjian
    Xie, Jianfeng
    Zhang, Yingyi
    Bao, Lei
    Zhou, Haoyu
    Ye, Hengdi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 332
  • [5] New understanding about the relationship between surface ignition and low-carbon iron ore sintering performance
    Fan, Xiaohui
    Zhao, Yuanjie
    Ji, Zhiyun
    Li, Haorui
    Gan, Min
    Zhou, Haoyu
    Chen, Xuling
    Huang, Xiaoxian
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 146 : 267 - 275