Effect of defoliation on growth, reproductive characters and yield in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

被引:0
作者
Mondal, M. Monjurul Alam [3 ]
Fakir, Md Solaiman Ali [2 ]
Ismail, Mohd Razi [1 ]
Ashrafuzzaman, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Inst Trop Agr, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Dept Crop Bot, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
[3] Bangladesh Inst Nucl Agr, Crop Physiol Div, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
关键词
canopy structure; defoliation; dry matter production; mungbean; seed yield; WEIGHT; MAIZE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Loss of foliage in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] crop through leaf eating insects and diseases is common in tropical and sub-tropical countries where farmers do not protect their crops adequately. Experiments were carried out with eight levels of defoliations (0, 25, 50 and 75% either from top or from base of the canopy, and 100%) to investigate the growth, reproductive characters, and yield attributes in two high and two low yielding mungbean genotypes. Results revealed that degrees of defoliations parallely decreased leaf area and total dry matter (TDM) production irrespective of seasons and genotypes. Defoliation not only reduced source sizes but also decreased total sink (flower) production resulting in lower pod and seed yields. However, basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 indicating the fact that the mungbean plant, in general, can tolerate 25% basal leaf loss of the canopy. Furthermore, the high yielding genotypes showed higher compensatory mechanism of source loss than the low yielders. Exceeding this threshold limit (> 25%) either from the base or from the top of the canopy defoliation significantly reduced TDM and seed yield. Reduction in yield was higher with top defoliation than basal defoliation. Implication of the results in relation to pest management is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 992
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Abdi S., 2007, AGR NAT RES SCI TECH, V11, P245
  • [2] Barimavandi AR, 2010, AUST J CROP SCI, V4, P9
  • [3] Begum M, 1997, BANGLADESH J AGR RES, V22, P43
  • [4] Bhatt R. M., 2003, Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, V8, P345
  • [5] Biswas M, 2005, J BANGLADESH AGR U, V3, P13
  • [6] Critical light interception during seed filling for insecticide application and optimum soybean grain yield
    Board, JE
    Wier, AT
    Boethel, DJ
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1997, 89 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [7] Late-planted soybean yield response to reproductive source/sink stress
    Board, JE
    Harville, BG
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1998, 38 (03) : 763 - 771
  • [8] Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean:: a quantitative reappraisal
    Borrás, L
    Slafer, GA
    Otegui, ME
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 86 (2-3) : 131 - 146
  • [9] CHEN CY, 1991, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V25, P437
  • [10] GHOSH B K, 1986, Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, V29, P351