Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis

被引:52
作者
Gros, A [1 ]
Vatovec, J [1 ]
Zargi, M [1 ]
Jenko, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Cervicofacial Surg, Ljubljana 1525, Slovenia
关键词
hearing improvement; otosclerosis; revision stapes surgery;
D O I
10.1097/01.mao.0000172414.64907.9d
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hearing results of revision stapes surgery performed because of previously failed operations and to determine the causes of failure. Study Design: Retrospective review of revision stapes operations. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Sixty-three consecutive revision stapes operations were performed in 56 patients over a period of 12 years (19922004). The indication for revision surgery was recurrent or persistent air-bone gap greater than 20 dB after primary surgical treatment of otosclerosis of the oval window. Results: All patients were operated on to improve hearing. Sixty-three revision stapes operations resulted in closure of the air-bone gap to 10 dB or less in 52.4% of cases. The average postoperative air-bone gap was 13.1 dB, and the mean pure-tone average improvement was 12.9 dB. In six patients (9.5%), revision surgery produced no change in hearing, and in four (6.3%) the hearing decreased by 5 dB or more. In one patient, the operation resulted in a profound hearing loss. Prosthesis malfunction was the most common primary cause of failure (60.3%). The original prosthesis was replaced with a new one in 48 cases. In 30 of these (62.5%), closure of the air-bone gap to within 10 dB was achieved. In 15 cases, the prosthesis was not replaced, and in only four of these (26.7%), closure of the air-bone gap within 10 dB was obtained (p < 0.022). Conclusion: Revision stapes surgery is less likely to be successful than the primary operation. Closure of the air-bone gap to within 10 dB was achieved in 52.4% of patients. The success rate was better in cases where the original prosthesis was replaced with a new one. The risk for decreased bone-conduction threshold does not seem to be higher than in primary surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1148
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
CAUSSE JB, 1982, OTOLARYNG CLIN N AM, V15, P813
[2]   REVISION STAPES SURGERY - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION [J].
COKKESER, Y ;
NAGUIB, M ;
ARISTEGUI, M ;
SALEH, E ;
LANDOLFI, M ;
RUSSO, A ;
SANNA, M .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1994, 111 (04) :473-477
[3]  
CRABTREE JA, 1980, LARYNGOSCOPE, V90, P224
[4]  
DERLACKI EL, 1985, LARYNGOSCOPE, V95, P1047
[5]   STAPES PROSTHESIS COMPARISON [J].
ELONKA, DR ;
DERLACKI, EL ;
HARRISON, WH .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1982, 90 (02) :263-265
[6]  
FARRIOR J, 1991, LARYNGOSCOPE, V101, P1155
[7]   3. EXPERIENCES WITH REVISION STAPEDECTOMY PROCEDURES [J].
FELDMAN, BA ;
SCHUKNECHT, HF .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1970, 80 (08) :1281-+
[8]   Malleostapedotomy in revision surgery for otosclerosis [J].
Fisch, U ;
Acar, GÖ ;
Huber, AM .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2001, 22 (06) :776-785
[9]   25 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE WITH STAPEDECTOMY [J].
GLASSCOCK, ME ;
STORPER, IS ;
HAYNES, DS ;
BOHRER, PS .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1995, 105 (09) :899-904
[10]   REVISION STAPEDECTOMY SURGERY [J].
GLASSCOCK, ME ;
MCKENNAN, KX ;
LEVINE, SC .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1987, 96 (02) :141-148