Environmental assessment of farm-scaled anaerobic co-digestion for bioenergy production

被引:41
作者
Lijo, Lucia [1 ]
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara [1 ]
Bacenetti, Jacopo [2 ]
Negri, Marco [2 ]
Fiala, Marco [2 ]
Feijoo, Gumersindo [1 ]
Teresa Moreira, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Prod, Landscape,Agroenergy, Milan, Italy
关键词
Digestate management; Environmental profile; Life cycle assessment; Maize silage; Pig slurry; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; METHANE EMISSIONS; BIOGAS-PRODUCTION; NITROUS-OXIDE; PART II; FERMENTATION; SYSTEMS; SLURRY; IMPACT; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.043
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the environmental profile of a bioenergy system based on a co-digestion plant using maize silage and pig slurry as substrates. All the processes involved in the production of bioenergy as well as the avoided processes accrued from the biogas production system were evaluated. The results evidenced the environmental importance of the cultivation step and the environmental credits associated to the avoided processes. In addition, this plant was compared with two different plants that digest both substrates separately. The results revealed the environmental benefits of the utilisation of pig slurry due to the absence of environmental burdens associated with its production as well as credits provided when avoiding its conventional management. The results also presented the environmental drawbacks of the utilisation of maize silage due to the environmental burdens related with its production. Accordingly, the anaerobic mono-digestion of maize silage achieved the worst results. The co-digestion of both substrates was ranked in an intermediate position. Additionally, three possible digestate management options were assessed. The results showed the beneficial effect of digestate application as an organic fertiliser, principally on account of environmental credits due to avoided mineral fertilisation. However, digestate application involves important acidifying and eutrophicating emissions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 59
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Althaus H.J., 2007, NO8 EMPA
[2]  
Anasruron D.F.D., 2009, 14 RAM INT C TECHN D, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 14040 ISO
[4]  
[Anonymous], DAN EM INV STAT COMB
[5]  
[Anonymous], BIOGAS SETTORE STRUT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Tech. Rep.
[7]   Environmental assessment of two different crop systems in terms of biomethane potential production [J].
Bacenetti, Jacopo ;
Fusi, Alessandra ;
Negri, Marco ;
Guidetti, Riccardo ;
Fiala, Marco .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 466 :1066-1077
[8]   Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: Impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process [J].
Bacenetti, Jacopo ;
Negri, Marco ;
Fiala, Marco ;
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 463 :541-551
[9]   Analysis of methane yields from energy crops and agricultural by-products and estimation of energy potential from sustainable crop rotation systems in EU-27 [J].
Bauer, Alexander ;
Leonhartsberger, Christian ;
Boesch, Peter ;
Amon, Barbara ;
Friedl, Anton ;
Amon, Thomas .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2010, 12 (02) :153-161
[10]  
Berglund M., 2006, Biogas Production from a Systems Analytical Perspective [PhD thesis]. Lund: Lund University. 164 p