Four-year-old Cantonese-speaking children's online processing of relative clauses: a permutation analysis

被引:25
作者
Chan, Angel [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wenchun [1 ]
Chang, Franklin [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Kidd, Evan [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Res Ctr Chinese Linguist, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] ARC Ctr Excellence Dynam Language, Acton, ACT, Australia
[5] ESRC Int Ctr Language & Commun Dev LuCiD, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
NOUN PHRASE ACCESSIBILITY; LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION; LEXICAL-BIASES; COMPREHENSION; ENGLISH; GERMAN; RELATIVIZATION; CONSTRAINTS; HIERARCHY; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1017/S0305000917000198
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
We report on an eye-tracking study that investigated four-year-old Cantonese-speaking children's online processing of subject and object relative clauses (RCs). Children's eye-movements were recorded as they listened to RC structures identifying a unique referent (e.g. Can you pick up the horse that pushed the pig?). Two RC types, classifier (CL) and ge3 RCs, were tested in a between-participants design. The two RC types differ in their syntactic analyses and frequency of occurrence, providing an important point of comparison for theories of RC acquisition and processing. A permutation analysis showed that the two structures were processed differently: CL RCs showed a significant object-over-subject advantage, whereas ge3 RCs showed the opposite effect. This study shows that children can have different preferences even for two very similar RC structures within the same language, suggesting that syntactic processing preferences are shaped by the unique features of particular constructions both within and across different linguistic typologies.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 203
页数:30
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions [J].
Abbot-Smith, Kirsten ;
Behrens, Heike .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2006, 30 (06) :995-1026
[2]   The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition [J].
Ambridge, Ben ;
Kidd, Evan ;
Rowland, Caroline F. ;
Theakston, Anna L. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2015, 42 (02) :239-273
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
Aoun J., 2003, ESSAYS REPRESENTATIO
[5]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[6]  
BORNKESSELSCHLE. I, 2009, LANGUAGE AND LINGUIS, V3, P19, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1749-818X.2008.00099.X
[7]   The acquisition of German relative clauses: A case study [J].
Brandt, Silke ;
Diessel, Holger ;
Tomasello, Michael .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2008, 35 (02) :325-348
[8]   The discourse bases of relativization: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses [J].
Brandt, Silke ;
Kidd, Evan ;
Lieven, Elena ;
Tomasello, Michael .
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 2009, 20 (03) :539-570
[9]  
Bretz F., 2010, Multiple Comparisons Using R, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420010909
[10]   Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon ;
Vergara, Marta ;
de la Cruz-Pavia, Irene ;
Laka, Itziar .
COGNITION, 2010, 115 (01) :79-92