Antitakeover provisions and CEO monetary benefits: Revisiting the E-index

被引:7
作者
Al Dah, Bilal [1 ]
Michael, Amir [2 ]
Dixon, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Olayan Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Univ Durham, Sch Business, Durham, England
关键词
Corporate governance; Antitakeover provisions; CEO duality; Managerial entrenchment; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; GOLDEN PARACHUTES; BOARD COMPOSITION; POISON PILLS; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; COMPENSATION; TAKEOVER; DIRECTORS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.033
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We analyze and group antitakeover provisions as they relate to CEO's monetary benefits. We specifically focus on the determinants of the six E-index provisions that were proposed by Bebchuk et al. (2009) to conversely affect firm value. The six provisions are split into two indices: those that provide managers with a monetary benefit if a takeover was successful (MB provisions) and those that do not (TP provisions). Results indicate that CEOs with a role duality use their power to influence the adoption of MB provisions and resist the adoption of TP provisions. Moreover, in the presence of CEO duality, the relationship between MB provisions and firm value worsens. On the other hand, the relationship between TP provisions and firm value is unaffected by the presence of CEO duality. This suggests that CEOs having a role duality do not feel the need to work in the shareholders' best interest when entrenched with MB provisions. Our findings suggest that studying all the provisions of the E-index as a whole can be misleading in some cases.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 1004
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Managerial compensation and the threat of takeover [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Knoeber, CR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 47 (02) :219-239
[2]   Board of directors' composition and capital structure [J].
Alves, Paulo ;
Barbosa Couto, Eduardo ;
Morais Francisco, Paulo .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2015, 35 :1-32
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Finance reconsidered: New perspectives for a responsible and sustainable finance
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, SOCIOLOGICAL PARADIG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J
[6]   Capital structure theory: Reconsidered [J].
Ardalan, Kavous .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2017, 39 :696-710
[7]   MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES, MONITORING, AND RISK BEARING - A STUDY OF EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION, OWNERSHIP, AND BOARD STRUCTURE IN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS [J].
BEATTY, RP ;
ZAJAC, EJ .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1994, 39 (02) :313-335
[8]   The costs of entrenched boards [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Cohen, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 78 (02) :409-433
[9]   What Matters in Corporate Governance? [J].
Bebchuk, Lucian ;
Cohen, Alma ;
Ferrell, Allen .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (02) :783-827
[10]   Governance and innovation [J].
Becker-Blease, John R. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2011, 17 (04) :947-958