A comparison of tandem ring and tandem ovoid treatment as a curative brachytherapy component for cervical cancer

被引:11
作者
Gursel, Sukriye Bilge [1 ]
Serarslan, Alparslan [1 ]
Meydan, Ahmet Deniz [1 ]
Okumus, Nilgun [1 ]
Yasayacak, Tenzile [1 ]
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Med, Radiat Oncol Dept, Samsun 55270, Turkey
关键词
brachytherapy; ring; ovoid; three-dimensional planning; high-risk clinical target volume; GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; INTRACAVITARY; RECOMMENDATIONS; VOLUME; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; APPLICATOR; TERMS;
D O I
10.5114/jcb.2020.94308
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The standard treatment for locally advanced stage cervical cancer is definitive radiotherapy, the quality of which affects both survival and side effects. Brachytherapy is a major component of definitive radiotherapy; it is administered using different techniques and applicators. The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically compare tandem ovoid (T-ovoid) and tandem ring (T-ring) brachytherapy treatments. Material and methods: Both applicator sets were applied to the same 20 patients, and treatment plans were made three-dimensionally (3D), with high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and organs at risk contoured. The HR-CTV was defined according to post-external magnetic resonance results. The patients with residual tumors not exceeding one-third of the parametrium were included in this study, while patients with larger masses were excluded and received interstitial therapy. The doses were calculated for both plans. Optimization for the HR-CTV was made with the aim that the equivalent dose according to 2 Gy (EQD(2)) of 90% of the HR-CTV (D-90) would be higher than 85 Gy, without exceeding the maximum dose for organs at risk. Then, pairwise dosimetric comparisons were performed. Results: Plans were compared dosimetrically according to the HR-CTV, point A and B doses, and organs at risk. Although the point A and B doses were higher with T-ovoid use, the 3D HR-CTV coverage was statistically better with T-ring application (EQD(2) of HR-CTV D-90: 97.46 Gy for T-ring and 88.44 Gy for T-ovoid; p < 0.0001). In addition, the rectum and bladder doses were statistically lower with T-ring usage (EQD(2) of rectum, 2 cc; T-ring, 63.10 Gy; T-ovoid, 74.99 Gy; p < 0.0001; EQD(2) of bladder, 2 cc; T-ring, 85.26 Gy; T-ovoid, 89.05 Gy; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In our study with a limited number of samples, T-ring applicator seems to offer better 3D brachytherapy dosimetry for both HR-CTV and nearby organs at risk.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, TURK CANC STAT DAT, P16
[2]  
Chassagne D., 1985, Report 38. 23, V20, P1, DOI [10.1093/jicru/os20.1.Report38, DOI 10.1093/JICRU/OS20.1.REPORT38]
[3]   Impact of brachytherapy technique (2D versus 3D) on outcome following radiotherapy of cervical cancer [J].
Derks, Kris ;
Steenhuijsen, Jacco L. G. ;
van den Berg, Hetty A. ;
Houterman, Saskia ;
Cnossen, Jeltsje ;
van Haaren, Paul ;
De Jaeger, Katrien .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (01) :17-25
[4]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRACHYTHERAPY DOSE AND OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH BULKY ENDOCERVICAL TUMORS TREATED WITH RADIATION ALONE [J].
EIFEL, PJ ;
THOMS, WW ;
SMITH, TL ;
MORRIS, M ;
OSWALD, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (01) :113-118
[5]   Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 [J].
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Dikshit, Rajesh ;
Eser, Sultan ;
Mathers, Colin ;
Rebelo, Marise ;
Parkin, Donald Maxwell ;
Forman, David ;
Bray, Freddie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) :E359-E386
[6]   Image guided adaptive brachytherapy with combined intracavitary and interstitial technique improves the therapeutic ratio in locally advanced cervical cancer: Analysis from the retro EMBRACE study [J].
Fokdal, Lars ;
Sturdza, Alina ;
Mazeron, Renaud ;
Haie-Meder, Christine ;
Tan, Li Tee ;
Gillham, Charles ;
Segedin, Barbara ;
Jurgenliemk-Schultz, Ina ;
Kirisits, Christian ;
Hoskin, Peter ;
Poetter, Richard ;
Lindegaard, Jacob C. ;
Tanderup, Kari .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (03) :434-440
[7]   The global burden of women's cancers: a grand challenge in global health [J].
Ginsburg, Ophira ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Coleman, Michel P. ;
Vanderpuye, Verna ;
Eniu, Alexandru ;
Kotha, S. Rani ;
Sarker, Malabika ;
Tran Thanh Huong ;
Allemani, Claudia ;
Dvaladze, Allison ;
Gralow, Julie ;
Yeates, Karen ;
Taylor, Carolyn ;
Oomman, Nandini ;
Krishnan, Suneeta ;
Sullivan, Richard ;
Kombe, Dominista ;
Blas, Magaly M. ;
Parham, Groesbeck ;
Kassami, Natasha ;
Conteh, Lesong .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :847-860
[8]   Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group* (I):: concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV [J].
Haie-Meder, C ;
Pötter, R ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Briot, E ;
De Brabandere, M ;
Dimopoulos, J ;
Dumas, I ;
Hellebust, TP ;
Kirisits, C ;
Lang, SF ;
Muschitz, S ;
Nevinson, J ;
Nulens, A ;
Petrow, P ;
Wachter-Gerstner, N .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (03) :235-245
[9]   Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group: Considerations and pitfalls in commissioning and applicator reconstruction in 3D image-based treatment planning of cervix cancer brachytherapy [J].
Hellebust, Taran Paulsen ;
Kirisits, Christian ;
Berger, Daniel ;
Perez-Calatayud, Jose ;
De Brabandere, Marisol ;
De Leeuw, Astrid ;
Dumas, Isabelle ;
Hudej, Robert ;
Lowe, Gerry ;
Wills, Rachel ;
Tanderup, Kari .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (02) :153-160
[10]   DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF TANDEM AND OVOIDS VS. TANDEM AND RING FOR INTRACAVITARY GYNECOLOGIC APPLICATIONS [J].
Levin, Daphne ;
Menhel, Janna ;
Rabin, Tanya ;
Pfeffer, M. Raphael ;
Symon, Zvi .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2008, 33 (04) :315-320