Think tank 2.0 for deliberative policy analysis

被引:17
作者
Li, Ya [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Deliberative policy analysis; Think tank 2.0; Public participation; Dispute resolution; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; DISCOURSE; DIALOGUE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11077-014-9207-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Deliberative policy analysis (DPA) is one of the significant developments in the trend of post-positivist policy analysis. However, the question of how to practice is a thorny issue hindering its development and dissemination. More particularly, the organizational aspect for the practice of DPA has never been well explored. Taking an organizational perspective, this article proposes a novel concept of "think tank 2.0" (TT2.0), which is designed to host deliberative analysts and to integrate the policy inquiry with public participation, deliberation, and dispute resolution. The article begins with a hypothetical example to showcase what DPA means and how it works. The following section presents a brief review of the principles of DPA, and a call for developing DPA institutes on account of the complexity of conducting deliberative analysis. Next, the article brings the conceptual framework of TT2.0 and its two models: an external model describing the relations among TT2.0 and other policy actors and an internal model structuring the roles within a TT2.0 and their division of labor. Finally, the article discusses some varieties of TT2.0 in operation and suggests several strategies for devising and operating TT2.0.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 50
页数:26
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Abelson D.E., 2009, THINK TANKS MATTER A, V2nd
[2]  
Andrews C.J., 2002, Humble analysis: the practice of joint fact-finding
[3]  
[Anonymous], EXPT POLICY RES METH
[4]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[5]   The Policy Sciences of Social Media [J].
Auer, Matthew R. .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2011, 39 (04) :709-736
[6]   Uses of evidence in local cultural policy: performance, legitimation, problem representation, and learning in two Australian municipalities [J].
Blomkamp, Emma .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2014, 10 (02) :223-241
[7]   Designing Public Participation Processes [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Quick, Kathryn S. ;
Slotterback, Carissa Schively ;
Crosby, Barbara C. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 (01) :23-34
[8]  
Carpenter S., 1988, MANAGING PUBLIC DISP
[9]  
Coleman Stephen., 2012, The Argumentative Turn Revisited, P149
[10]  
De Leon P., 1997, DEMOCRACY POLICY SCI