Visual Aanalysis of Midwifery Research in China Based on Bibliometrics

被引:6
作者
He, Jingjing [1 ,2 ]
Wan, Li [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wenqian [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Biru [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol Nursing, West China Sch Nursing, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
bibliometrics; Chinese; midwifery; visualization; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jmwh.13379
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction This study used bibliometrics to analyze the current trends, hotspots, and frontiers in Chinese midwifery research. Methods A search was conducted among midwifery literature published from 2010 to 2020, and bibliometric and information visualization analyses were conducted using the acquired data. A bibliometric analysis was performed on the quantity and trends in midwifery research, distribution of and cooperation among research institutions, coauthorship, distribution of disciplines, high-frequency keywords, and burst terms. Cooperation mode, research hotspots, and research frontiers were also analyzed. Results The findings indicate that the number of midwifery research studies have been steadily increasing in China over the last decade. During the study period, Guangdong Province, which received the most research funding, produced the highest number of published articles, followed by Beijing and Shanghai. Research institutions related to midwifery are mainly universities with a strong focus on scientific research. Contemporary topics include core competencies and birth outcomes; research frontiers, including education; competence; and evidence-based practice. Discussion China should accelerate in-depth midwifery research; increase opportunities for regional, institutional, and team cooperation; promote the sublimation of midwifery work from practical experience to disciplinary theory; and provide higher-quality professional services for maternal and child health. Bibliometric analyses may be used to examine midwifery research in other countries too.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 487
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Research 'frontiers' [J].
Antoft, R ;
Lundbäck, E ;
Weber, K .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2003, 24 (03) :493-496
[2]   A methodological review of qualitative case study methodology in midwifery research [J].
Atchan, Marjorie ;
Davis, Deborah ;
Foureur, Maralyn .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (10) :2259-2271
[3]   Natural hazards, disaster management and simulation: a bibliometric analysis of keyword searches [J].
Barnes, Beth ;
Dunn, Sarah ;
Wilkinson, Sean .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 97 (02) :813-840
[4]   Infant feeding practices within a large electronic medical record database [J].
Bartsch, Emily ;
Park, Alison L. ;
Young, Jacqueline ;
Ray, Joel G. ;
Tu, Karen .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
[5]   A cross-sectional audit of the risk of burnout among senior medical staff in a UK district general hospital [J].
Baverstock, Anna ;
Coulston, James ;
Dayer, Mark .
CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (02) :203-207
[6]  
Chen Y., 2015, STUD SCI SCI, V33, P242, DOI [10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2015.02.009, DOI 10.16192/J.CNKI.1003-2053.2015.02.009]
[7]   The subject matter of phenomenological research: existentials, modes, and prejudices [J].
Fernandez, Anthony Vincent .
SYNTHESE, 2017, 194 (09) :3543-3562
[8]  
He J., 2018, CHIN NURS RES, V32, P39
[9]  
He JJ, 2021, J NURS TRAINING, V36, P1062, DOI [10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.12.002, DOI 10.16821/J.CNKI.HSJX.2021.12.002]
[10]   The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics [J].
Hicks, Diana ;
Wouters, Paul ;
Waltman, Ludo ;
de Rijcke, Sarah ;
Rafols, Ismael .
NATURE, 2015, 520 (7548) :429-431