Data Injection Attacks in Randomized Gossiping

被引:40
作者
Gentz, Reinhard [1 ]
Wu, Sissi Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Wai, Hoi-To [1 ]
Scaglione, Anna [1 ]
Leshem, Amir [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Elect Comp & Energy Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Fac Engn, IL-5290002 Ramat Gan, Israel
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING OVER NETWORKS | 2016年 / 2卷 / 04期
基金
以色列科学基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Attack detection; data injection attack; decentralized learning; randomized gossip protocol; ALGORITHMS; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1109/TSIPN.2016.2614898
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The subject of this paper is the detection and mitigation of data injection attacks in randomized average consensus gossip algorithms. It is broadly known that the main advantages of randomized average consensus gossip are its fault tolerance and distributed nature. Unfortunately, the flat architecture of the algorithm also increases the attack surface for a data injection attack. Even though we cast our problem in the context of sensor network security, the attack scenario is identical to existing models for opinion dynamics (the so-called DeGroot model) with stubborn agents steering the opinions of the group toward a final state that is not the average of the network initial states. We specifically propose two novel strategies for detecting and locating attackers and study their detection and localization performance numerically and analytically. Our detection and localization methods are completely decentralized and, therefore, nodes can directly act on their conclusions and stop receiving information from nodes identified as attackers. As we show by simulation, the network can often recover in this fashion, leveraging the resilience of randomized gossiping to reduced network connectivity.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 538
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Como, Giacomo ;
Fagnani, Fabio ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2013, 38 (01) :1-27
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Concentration Inequalities and Model Selection
[3]   Broadcast Gossip Algorithms for Consensus [J].
Aysal, Tuncer Can ;
Yildiz, Mehmet Ercan ;
Sarwate, Anand D. ;
Scaglione, Anna .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 57 (07) :2748-2761
[4]  
Ben-Ameur W., 2012, 2012 6th International ICST Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools (VALUETOOLS 2012). Proceedings, P99, DOI 10.4108/icst.valuetools.2012.250316
[5]   Randomized gossip algorithms [J].
Boyd, Stephen ;
Ghosh, Arpita ;
Prabhakar, Balaji ;
Shah, Devavrat .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2006, 52 (06) :2508-2530
[6]   REACHING A CONSENSUS [J].
DEGROOT, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (345) :118-121
[7]   Gossip Algorithms for Distributed Signal Processing [J].
Dimakis, Alexandros G. ;
Kar, Soummya ;
Moura, Jose M. F. ;
Rabbat, Michael G. ;
Scaglione, Anna .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2010, 98 (11) :1847-1864
[8]  
Gentz R, 2015, 2015 49TH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, P350, DOI 10.1109/ACSSC.2015.7421145
[9]   A tail inequality for quadratic forms of subgaussian random vectors [J].
Hsu, Daniel ;
Kakade, Sham M. ;
Zhang, Tong .
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN PROBABILITY, 2012, 17 :1-6
[10]  
Kailkhura B, 2015, ARXIV150403413