Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in Lower Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision

被引:26
作者
Chang, Tung-Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Kiu, Kee-Thai [1 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, 291 Zhongzheng Rd, New Taipei 235, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2018年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
rectal cancer; transanal; TME; laparoscopy; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; ASSISTED RESECTION; SURGERY; RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2017.0520
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a novel technique to treat rectal cancer and also to obtain good-quality specimens. This study investigated the clinical results and perioperative and pathological outcomes of TaTME in lower rectal cancer treatment in comparison with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME). Methods: During January 2014 to May 2017, all consecutive patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent TaTME were identified. This cohort study was matched for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, and clinical staging with a cohort of patients who underwent conventional LaTME. Results: A total of 46 patients were analyzed in both groups. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The estimated blood loss, duration of operation, and postoperative complications were also not different between both groups. Regarding pathological outcomes, no patients with circumferential margin (CRM) <1mm were observed in the TaTME group compared to 4 patients with CRM <1mm in the LaTME group (P=.037). Conclusion: TaTME is a safe and feasible procedure in this matched case-control study. TaTME had better pathological outcomes with CRM uninvolvement compared with laparoscopic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 369
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer [J].
Akiyoshi, Takashi ;
Kuroyanagi, Hiroya ;
Oya, Masatoshi ;
Konishi, Tsuyoshi ;
Fukuda, Meiki ;
Fujimoto, Yoshiya ;
Ueno, Masashi ;
Miyata, Satoshi ;
Yamaguchi, Toshiharu .
SURGERY, 2009, 146 (03) :483-489
[2]   Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution [J].
Atallah, S. ;
Martin-Perez, B. ;
Albert, M. ;
deBeche-Adams, T. ;
Nassif, G. ;
Hunter, L. ;
Larach, S. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2014, 18 (05) :473-480
[3]   A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer [J].
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
Deijen, Charlotte L. ;
Abis, Gabor A. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M. ;
de lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. ;
Lacy, Antonio M. ;
Bemelman, Willem A. ;
Andersson, John ;
Angenete, Eva ;
Rosenberg, Jacob ;
Fuerst, Alois ;
Haglind, Eva .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (14) :1324-1332
[4]   Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: early outcomes in 50 consecutive patients [J].
Burke, J. P. ;
Martin-Perez, B. ;
Khan, A. ;
Nassif, G. ;
de Beche-Adams, T. ;
Larach, S. W. ;
Albert, M. R. ;
Atallah, S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (06) :570-577
[5]   Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: A Matched Case-Control Study [J].
Chen, Chien-Chih ;
Lai, Yi-Ling ;
Jiang, Jeng-Kae ;
Chu, Chun-Ho ;
Huang, I-Ping ;
Chen, Wei-Shone ;
Yi-Ming, Andy ;
Yang, Shung-Haur .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) :1169-1176
[6]   Perineal Transanal Approach A New Standard for Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Resection in Low Rectal Cancer, a Randomized Trial [J].
Denost, Quentin ;
Adam, Jean-Philippe ;
Rullier, Anne ;
Buscail, Etienne ;
Laurent, Christophe ;
Rullier, Eric .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (06) :993-999
[7]   Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Short-term Outcomes in Comparison With Laparoscopic Surgery [J].
Fernandez-Hevia, Maria ;
Delgado, Salvadora ;
Castells, Antoni ;
Tasende, Marta ;
Momblan, Dulce ;
del Gobbo, Gabriel Diaz ;
DeLacy, Borja ;
Balust, Jaume ;
Lacy, Antonio M. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (02) :221-227
[8]   Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Fleshman, James ;
Branda, Megan ;
Sargent, Daniel J. ;
Boller, Anne Marie ;
George, Virgilio ;
Abbas, Maher ;
Peters, Walter R., Jr. ;
Maun, Dipen ;
Chang, George ;
Herline, Alan ;
Fichera, Alessandro ;
Mutch, Matthew ;
Wexner, Steven ;
Whiteford, Mark ;
Marks, John ;
Birnbaum, Elisa ;
Margolin, David ;
Larson, David ;
Marcello, Peter ;
Posner, Mitchell ;
Read, Thomas ;
Monson, John ;
Wren, Sherry M. ;
Pisters, Peter W. T. ;
Nelson, Heidi .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (13) :1346-1355
[9]  
HEALD RJ, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1479
[10]   THE MESORECTUM IN RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - THE CLUE TO PELVIC RECURRENCE [J].
HEALD, RJ ;
HUSBAND, EM ;
RYALL, RDH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (10) :613-616