Artificial intelligence in the system of electronic justice by consideration of corporate disputes

被引:5
作者
Andreev, V. K. [1 ]
Laptev, V. A. [1 ]
Chucha, S. Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Law Univ, 9 Sadovaya Kudrinskaya Ul, Moscow 125993, Russia
来源
VESTNIK OF SAINT PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY-LAW-VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-PRAVO | 2020年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
court; legal proceedings; artificial intelligence; electronic justice; corporate disputes; electronic proofs; legal proceedings language; digital protocol; judicial cloud; large deals;
D O I
10.21638/spbu14.2020.102
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Trends in the development of modern public relations illustrate a desire to use artificial intelligence in the field of electronic justice. The developed ideas of technological aspects in the work of artificial intelligence do not add up in terms of justice for both domestic and foreign jurists. The unpreparedness of a legislator to define a legal regime of work for artificial intelligence is caused by lack of experience in its use. Implementation of artificial intelligence in the activities of society will show the merits and demerits only after some time. Under the specified circumstances, forecasting the prospects of development for mechanisms of legal regulation in the work of machine intelligence is represented very conditionally. In the present article, possible ways and legal consequences for the implementation of artificial intelligence in the system of electronic justice in Russia on the example of corporate disputes are investigated. The chosen category of disputes is not accidental. By considering corporate disputes, artificial intelligence will allow courts to quickly and authentically establish the essential facts of the case, to check arguments of participants in the process and, as a result, it is essential to reduce the time of acceptance of the objective decision. In corporate relations often an assessment is required of the conscientiousness behavior of participants regardless of the emotional and psychological factors, in particular influencing the work of the judge-person. The understanding of artificial intelligence as a digital program on the basis of its programmers of mathematical algorithms, developing "new" solutions (machine thinking), demands research of algorithms of its work in court, including in terms of optimization of trial and the purpose for establishment of the truth in business. In the work, two scopes of artificial intelligence in court are divided by consideration of corporate disputes: office-work and the general judicial proceedings; assessment of proofs and establishment of legally significant circumstances in a corporate dispute.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 34
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Alekseeva Ekaterina, 2018, EZH IURIST, V28, P8
[2]   Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective [J].
Aletras, Nikolaos ;
Tsarapatsanis, Dimitrios ;
Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel ;
Lampos, Vasileios .
PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 2016 (10)
[3]  
Buocz Thomas Julius, 2018, Retskraft-Copenhagen J Legal Stud, V2, P41
[4]  
Chucha, 2011, ZAKON, V2, P73
[5]  
Laptev, 2017, ELECT JUSTICE ELECT
[6]  
Laptev Vasily A., 2018, ROSSIISKAIA IUSTITSI, V9, P10
[7]  
Laptev Vasily A., 2017, ROSSIISKAIA IUSTITSI, V2, P56
[8]  
Morkhat Peter N., 2018, THESIS
[9]   Cobot architecture [J].
Peshkin, MA ;
Colgate, JE ;
Wannasuphoprasit, W ;
Moore, CA ;
Gillespie, RB ;
Akella, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 2001, 17 (04) :377-390
[10]  
Pittman K., 2016, INFOGRAPHIC BRIEF HI