Paul Tillich's perspectives on ways of relating science and religion

被引：3

作者：

Arther, DE ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Eden Theol Seminary, Webster Groves, MO 63119 USA

来源：

ZYGON | 2001年 / 36卷 / 02期

关键词：

conflict; correlation; dialogue; independence; integration; system of the sciences; theology of nature; ultimate concern;

D O I：

10.1111/0591-2385.00358

中图分类号：

D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Where do Paul Tillich's views of the relationship between religion and science fit in Ian Barbour's four classifications of conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration? At different:levels of analysis, he fits in all of them. In concrete religions and sciences, some conflict is evident, bur religion and science can be thought of as having parallel perspectives, languages, and objectives. Tillich's method of correlation itself is a form of dialogue. His theology of nature in "Life and the Spirit" (Part 4 of his Systematic Theology) fits the integration type. His strong "Two Types of Philosophy of Religion" (in Theology of Culture) is a latent natural theology. His system of the sciences is a form of synthesis, a type of integration.

引用

页码：261 / 267

页数：7