Applying the Q-method to identify primary motivation factors and barriers to communities in achieving decarbonisation goals

被引:20
作者
Byrne, Rosemary [1 ]
Byrne, Susan [1 ]
Ryan, Ray [1 ]
O'Regan, Bernadette [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Ctr Environm Res, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
关键词
Climate policy; Community action; Q-method; Barriers to action; Sustainable development; RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY POLICY; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY; UK HOUSEHOLDS; COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; CARBON; TRANSITIONS; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It has been predicted that despite previous reductions, greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland will continue to increase above current levels for the next 20 years. The benefit of mobilising community level action in addressing climate change action has already been seen in many European countries. While Irish governmental policy envisions as necessary greater community involvement in energy projects and other efforts to reduce carbon emissions, little progress has been encouraging or supporting such action. Using the Q-method, this study examined and identified where commonalities exist in Irish communities that have successfully implemented sustainable development goals, in terms of their motivation, attitudes, perceived barriers and opportunities for continued action. Results indicate that participants' main motivations are derived from a sense of responsibility to future generations and the need to live more balanced lifestyles. Results further suggest that short-term central government strategy, poor support, bureaucracy, and a lack of collaboration are seen as key limitations in developing and achieving effective community level sustainability action. This study contributes in understanding how climate change policy can be aligned to the preferred future vision of communities in bringing about effective change in transitioning to a low-carbon society.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 50
页数:11
相关论文
共 127 条
[61]   Public responses to climate change: The role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action [J].
Hobson, Kersty ;
Niemeyer, Simon .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (03) :957-971
[62]  
Hoff-Elimari E., 2014, European Journal of Government and Economics, V3, P24, DOI [10.17979/ejge.2014.3.1.4295, DOI 10.17979/EJGE.2014.3.1.4295]
[63]   From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program [J].
Hoffman, Steven M. ;
High-Pippert, Angela .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (12) :7567-7574
[64]  
Jackson Tim., 2009, Prosperity Without Growth? The Transition to a Sustainable Economy
[65]   The politics and policy of energy system transformation - explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology [J].
Jacobsson, S ;
Lauber, V .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (03) :256-276
[66]   Building low carbon communities in China: The role of individual's behaviour change and engagement [J].
Jiang, Ping ;
Chen, Yihui ;
Xu, Bin ;
Dong, Wenbo ;
Kennedy, Erin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 :611-620
[67]  
Kainiemi L., 2016, P 11 C SUST DEV EN W
[68]   Unravelling the (post-)political in Transition Management: Interrogating Pathways towards Sustainable Change [J].
Kenis, Anneleen ;
Bono, Federica ;
Mathijs, Erik .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :568-584
[69]   Grassroots social innovations and food localisation: An investigation of the Local Food programme in England [J].
Kirwan, James ;
Ilbery, Brian ;
Maye, Damian ;
Carey, Joy .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (05) :830-837
[70]   Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time [J].
Klein, Sharon J. W. ;
Coffey, Stephanie .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 60 :867-880