Limitations of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Success Prediction

被引:14
作者
Thornton, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois Hlth Sci Syst & Coll Nursing, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC); trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC); sensitivity; specificity; uterine rupture; maternal morbidity; perinatal morbidity; UTERINE RUPTURE; DELIVERY; VALIDATION; WOMEN; MODEL; TESTS; LABOR; RATES; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jmwh.12724
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine endorses an algorithm for estimating the probability of successful vaginal birth for women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). The algorithm is available online in the form of an easy-to-use calculator. This calculator has significant limitations that are easily overlooked by women and providers alike. The calculator has much greater positive than negative predictive power, and it cannot predict unsuccessful TOLAC or uterine rupture. Furthermore, the calculator cannot predict rare catastrophes, such as unplanned hysterectomy, permanent injury, or death. Predictions are heavily influenced by race and ethnicity, which are social and not biological constructs. Relevant variables, such as provider attitudes and institutional differences, are not accounted for. Providers should be mindful and transparent about calculator limitations when counseling women, particularly Latina and African American women. It may be appropriate to use the calculator to inform but not restrict women's options.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 120
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
    Bhide, Amarnath
    Caric, Vedrana
    Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 133 (03) : 297 - 300
  • [2] Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean in China
    Rao, Jiaming
    Fan, Dazhi
    Li, Pengsheng
    Li, Yiying
    Hu, Pengzhen
    Wu, Zhaoxia
    He, Jieyun
    Liu, Xinjuan
    Peng, BingJie
    Guo, Xiaoling
    Liu, Zhengping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 163 (01) : 202 - 210
  • [3] Vaginal birth after cesarean section prediction model for Jordanian population
    Awawdeh, Shatha
    Rawashdeh, Hasan
    Aljalodi, Haneen
    Abu Shamleh, Rafeef
    Alshorman, Sumyah
    COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 104
  • [4] Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients
    Wen, Juan
    Song, Xuejing
    Ding, Hongjuan
    Shen, Xiaofeng
    Shen, Rong
    Hu, Ling-qun
    Long, Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [5] Safety and success rate of vaginal birth after two cesarean sections: retrospective cohort study
    Modzelewski, Jan
    Jakubiak-Proc, Monika
    Materny, Anna
    Sotniczuk, Maria
    Kajdy, Anna
    Rabijewski, Michel
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2019, 90 (08) : 444 - 451
  • [6] Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning
    Lipschuetz, Michal
    Guedalia, Joshua
    Rottenstreich, Amihai
    Persky, Michal Novoselsky
    Cohen, Sarah M.
    Kabiri, Doron
    Levin, Gabriel
    Yagel, Simcha
    Unger, Ron
    Sompolinsky, Yishai
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (06) : 613.e1 - 613.e12
  • [7] Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Effective Method to Reduce Cesarean
    Sabol, Bethany
    Denman, Mary Anna
    Guise, Jeanne-Marie
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 58 (02) : 309 - 319
  • [8] Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between vaginal birth after cesarean section and normal vaginal birth
    Zhou, Ping
    Guo, Xiaoyan
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01)
  • [9] Vaginal birth after cesarean section in light of international opinions
    Nemeth Gabor
    Molnar Andras
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2017, 158 (30) : 1168 - 1174
  • [10] Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
    Harris, Benjamin S.
    Heine, R. Phillips
    Park, Jinyoung
    Faurot, Keturah R.
    Hopkins, Maeve K.
    Rivera, Andrew J.
    Kemeny, Hanna R.
    Grotegut, Chad A.
    Jelovsek, J. Eric
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) : 492.e1 - 492.e7