Patients' Perceptions of Radiation Exposure Associated With Mammography

被引:16
作者
Hollada, Jacqueline [1 ]
Speier, William [1 ,2 ]
Oshiro, Thomas [1 ]
Marzan-McGill, Roslynn [1 ]
Ruehm, Stefan G. [1 ]
Bassett, Lawrence W. [1 ]
Wells, Colin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA Med Imaging Informat, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
breast imaging; mammography; patient education; patient perceptions; radiation; RISK; CT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.14.13650
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Radiation associated with breast imaging is a sensitive issue, particularly for women who undergo mammography as a screening measure to detect breast cancer. Misinformation and misunderstanding regarding the risks associated with ionizing radiation have created heightened public concern and fear, which may result in avoidance of diagnostic procedures. The objectives of this study were to ascertain patients' knowledge and opinion of ionizing radiation as a whole and specifically in mammography, as well as to determine common misunderstandings and points of view that may affect women's decisions about whether to have a mammogram. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Over a 9-month period, a total of 1725 patients presenting for a mammogram completed a 25-point questionnaire focused on the following: general knowledge of radiation dose in common imaging modalities, the amount of radiation associated with a mammogram relative to five radiation benchmarks, and patients' opinions of the involvement of radiation in their health care. RESULTS. Although 65% of the women receiving a mammogram responded that they had been informed of the risks and benefits of the examination, 60% overestimated the radiation in a mammogram. CONCLUSION. Efforts should be made to accurately inform women of the risks and benefits of mammography, specifically highlighting the low dose of mammographic ionizing radiation and providing objective facts to ensure that they are making an informed decision regarding screening.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 221
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Friedman L C, 1995, J Cancer Educ, V10, P213
  • [22] Are we failing to communicate? Internet-based patient education materials and radiation safety
    Hansberry, David R.
    Ramchand, Tekchand
    Patel, Shyam
    Kraus, Carl
    Jung, Jin
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Gonzales, Sharon F.
    Baker, Stephen R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (09) : 1698 - 1702
  • [23] Do we glow? Evaluation of trauma team work habits and radiation exposure
    Hassan, Maleeha
    Patil, Abhijit
    Channel, Jane
    Khan, Fawad
    Knight, Jennifer
    Loos, Matthew
    Hazard, Hannah
    Schaefer, Gregory
    Wilson, Alison
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 (03) : 605 - 611
  • [24] Knox R., 2009, Radiation From CT Scans May Raise Cancer Risk
  • [25] The Early Clinical X-Ray in the United States: Patient Experiences and Public Perceptions
    Lavine, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2012, 67 (04) : 587 - 625
  • [26] Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks
    Lee, CI
    Haims, AH
    Monico, EP
    Brink, JA
    Forman, HP
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) : 393 - 398
  • [27] Medical communication: Do our patients understand?
    Lerner, EB
    Jehle, DVK
    Janicke, DM
    Moscati, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (07) : 764 - 766
  • [28] Ludwig Rebecca L, 2002, J Allied Health, V31, P159
  • [29] MILLAR R., 1994, Public Understanding Sci, V3, P53
  • [30] Radiation exposures to patients from CT: Reality, public perception, and policy
    Nickoloff, EL
    Alderson, PO
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) : 285 - 287