IMPACT OF SALIVARY GLAND DOSIMETRY ON POST-IMRT RECOVERY OF SALIVA OUTPUT AND XEROSTOMIA GRADE FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH OR WITHOUT CONTRALATERAL SUBMANDIBULAR GLAND SPARING: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

被引:50
作者
Wang, Zhong-He [1 ]
Yan, Chao [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi-Yuan [2 ]
Zhang, Chen-Ping [2 ]
Hu, Hat-Sheng [1 ]
Tu, Wen-Yong [1 ]
Kirwan, Jessica [3 ]
Mendenhall, William M.
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Div Radiat Oncol, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2011年 / 81卷 / 05期
关键词
Head-and-neck cancer; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy; Submandibular gland-sparing; Salivary flow; Xerostomia; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIATION-THERAPY; ORAL-CAVITY; ONCOLOGY-GROUP; VOLUME; FLOW; TOXICITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1990
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To observe the recovery of saliva output and effect on xerostomia grade after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without contralateral submandibular gland (cSMG) sparing and to assess the impact of salivary gland dosimetry on this recovery among patients with head-and-neck cancer. Methods and Materials: Between May 2007 and May 2008, 52 patients with head-and-neck cancer received definitive (n = 5 patients) and postoperative (n = 47 patients) IMRT at our institution, with at least one parotid gland spared. Of these patients, 26 patients with a low risk of recurrence in the cSMG region underwent IMRT and had their cSMGs spared (cSMG-sparing group). The remaining 26 high-risk patients had no cSMGs spired (cSMG-unspared group). Xerostomia grades and salivary flow rates were monitored at five time points (before IMRT and at 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after IMRT). Results: Average mean doses and mean volumes receiving 30 Gy (V30) of the cSMGs were lower in the cSMG-sparing group than in the cSMG-unspared group (mean dose, 20.4 Gy vs. 57.4 Gy; mean V30, 14.7% vs. 99.8%, respectively). Xerostomia grades at 2 and 6 months post-IMRT were also significantly lower among patients in the cSMG-sparing group than in the cSMG-unspared group, but differences were not significant at 12 and 18 months after IMRT. Patients in the cSMG-sparing group had significantly better mean unstimulated salivary flow rates at each time point post- IMRT as well as better mean stimulated salivary flow rates at 2 months post-IMRT. Conclusions: Recovery of saliva output and grade of xerostomia post-IMRT in patients whose cSMGs were spared were much better than in patients whose cSMGs were not spared. The influence of the mean doses to the cSMG and parotid gland on the recovery of saliva output was equivalent to that of the mean V30 to the glands. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1479 / 1487
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy [J].
Blanco, AI ;
Chao, KSC ;
El Naqa, I ;
Franklin, GE ;
Zakarian, K ;
Vicic, M ;
Deasy, JO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (04) :1055-1069
[2]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly reduces xerostomia compared with conventional radiotherapy [J].
Braam, Petra M. ;
Terhaard, Chris H. J. ;
Roesink, Judith M. ;
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (04) :975-980
[3]   TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC) [J].
COX, JD ;
STETZ, J ;
PAJAK, TF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1341-1346
[4]  
DAWES M, 1996, SALIVA ORAL HLTH, P27
[5]   How should we measure and report radiotherapy-induced xerostomia? [J].
Eisbruch, A ;
Rhodus, N ;
Rosenthal, D ;
Murphy, B ;
Rasch, C ;
Sonis, S ;
Scarantino, C ;
Brizel, D .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :226-234
[6]   Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer [J].
Eisbruch, A ;
Ten Haken, RK ;
Kim, HM ;
Marsh, LH ;
Ship, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (03) :577-587
[7]   PAROTID-GLAND FUNCTION DURING AND FOLLOWING RADIOTHERAPY OF MALIGNANCIES IN THE HEAD AND NECK - A CONSECUTIVE STUDY OF SALIVARY FLOW AND PATIENT DISCOMFORT [J].
FRANZEN, L ;
FUNEGARD, U ;
ERICSON, T ;
HENRIKSSON, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (2-3) :457-462
[8]   Matched case-control study of quality of life and xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: Initial report [J].
Jabbari, S ;
Kim, HM ;
Feng, M ;
Lin, A ;
Tsien, C ;
Elshaikh, M ;
Terrel, JE ;
Murdoch-Kinch, C ;
Eisbruch, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (03) :725-731
[9]   Does radiation dose to the salivary glands and oral cavity predict patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva in head and neck cancer patients treated with curative radiotherapy? [J].
Jellema, AP ;
Doornaert, P ;
Slotman, BJ ;
Leemans, CR ;
Langendijk, JA .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 77 (02) :164-171
[10]   Quality of life after parotid-sparing IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: A prospective longitudinal study [J].
Lin, A ;
Kim, HM ;
Terrell, JE ;
Dawson, LA ;
Ship, JA ;
Eisbruch, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (01) :61-70