Early Fitting in Cochlear Implantation: Benefits and Limits

被引:19
作者
Guenther, Stefanie [1 ]
Baumann, Uwe [1 ]
Stoever, Timo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Audiol Acoust, ENT Dept, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, ENT Dept, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Cochlear implant; Early fitting; Electrode impedance; Speech recognition; MINIMAL ACCESS; COMPLICATIONS; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000001745
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:Evaluation of a shortened delay time between surgical placement of the cochlear implant (CI) device and processor activation to less than 8 days (early CI fitting). Assessment of benefits and limits of early fitting in terms of medical, technical, audiological, and subjective outcome.Study Design:Prospective.Setting:Tertiary referral center.Patients:Forty-one patients scheduled for cochlear implant surgery divided into early fit (EF, n=21) and control group (CG, n=19).Main Outcome Measures:Questionnaires were used to evaluate technical, medical, and subjective outcomes associated with early fitting. Additional, electrode impedance and speech recognition scores were measured. These data, collected preoperative, at first activation and after 3 months were compared with the CG with standard fitting.Results:The medical and audiological status of the EF subjects allowed early fitting in nearly all patients (20/21). Evidence of pain, delayed wound healing, or other compromises was equal in both study groups. Speech recognition scores show comparable development over time for EF and CG. Average electrode impedance was significantly higher in the CG at first activation.Conclusions:Early fitting of the sound processor is feasible and did not compromise wound healing or generates additional pain. During the first month following surgery, reduction of wound swelling can be expected. Hence, regular inspection of magnet strength is recommended at follow-ups. Over all, early activation of their CI device was highly appreciated by nearly all patients.
引用
收藏
页码:E250 / E256
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Cochlear Implant Device Activation and Programming: 5 Days Postimplantation
    Alsabellha, Rabea M.
    Hagr, Abdulrahman
    Al-momani, Murad O.
    Garadat, Soha N.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (04) : E130 - E134
  • [2] Craddock Louise, 2016, Cochlear Implants Int, V17 Suppl 1, P26, DOI 10.1080/14670100.2016.1161122
  • [3] Headache and Degraded Speech Recognition in a Patient with unilateral Cochlear Implant
    Gaertner, L.
    Lesinski-Schiedat, A.
    Buechner, A.
    Lenarz, T.
    [J]. LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2016, 95 (08) : 559 - 560
  • [4] A NEW INCISION FOR PLACEMENT OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    GIBSON, WPR
    HARRISON, HC
    PROWSE, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1995, 109 (09) : 821 - 825
  • [5] Feasibility of one-day activation in cochlear implant recipients
    Hagr, Abdulrahman
    Garadat, Soha N.
    Al-Momani, Murad
    Alsabellha, Rabea M.
    Almuhawas, Fida A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (05) : 323 - 328
  • [6] Hoppe U, 2017, HNO, V65, P546, DOI 10.1007/s00106-016-0226-7
  • [7] Evolution of impedance field telemetry after one day of activation in cochlear implant recipients
    Hu, Hao-Chun
    Chen, Joshua Kuang-Chao
    Tsai, Chia-Mi
    Chen, Hsing-Yi
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    Li, Lieber Po-Hung
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [8] Kempf HG, 1999, LARYNGO RHINO OTOL, V78, P529
  • [9] Incidence and quality of vertigo symptoms after cochlear implantation
    Krause, E.
    Louza, J. P. R.
    Wechtenbruch, J.
    Hempel, J-M
    Rader, T.
    Gorkov, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2009, 123 (03) : 278 - 282
  • [10] Lenarz Thomas, 2017, Laryngorhinootologie, V96, pS123, DOI 10.1055/s-0043-101812