CEO-board dynamics

被引:74
作者
Graham, John R. [1 ]
Kim, Hyunseob [2 ]
Leary, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, NBER, Fuqua Sch Business, 100 Fuqua Dr, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Samuel Curtis Johnson Grad Sch Management, 114 East Ave, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Olin Sch Business, NBER, Campus Box 1133,One Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
Governance; Chief executive; Board of directors; Dynamic contracting; Bargaining; Compensation; Monitoring; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS; DIRECTORS; AGENCY; PERFORMANCE; TURNOVER; SIZE; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.04.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine CEO-board dynamics using a new panel dataset that spans 1920 to 2011. The long sample allows us to perform within-firm and within-CEO tests over a long horizon, many for the first time in the governance literature. Consistent with theories of bargaining or dynamic contracting, we find board independence increases at CEO turnover and falls with CEO tenure, with the decline stronger following superior performance. CEOs are also more likely to be appointed board chair as tenure increases, and we find evidence consistent with a substitution between board independence and chair duality. Other results suggest that these classes of models fail to capture important elements of board dynamics. First, the magnitude of the CEO tenure effect is economically small, much smaller, for example, than the strong persistence in board structure that we show. Second, when external CEOs are hired, board independence falls and subsequently increases. Third, event studies show a positive market reaction when powerful CEOs die in office, consistent with powerful CEOs becoming entrenched. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 636
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Adams R., 2006, REV FINANC STUD, V18, P1430
[2]   A theory of friendly boards [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Ferreira, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (01) :217-250
[3]   The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Hermalin, Benjamin E. ;
Weisbach, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2010, 48 (01) :58-107
[4]   DO WAGES RISE WITH JOB SENIORITY [J].
ALTONJI, JG ;
SHAKOTKO, RA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1987, 54 (03) :437-459
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1971, DIRECTORS MYTHS REAL
[6]  
Avedian A., 2015, UNPUB
[7]   The determinants of board structure at the initial public offering [J].
Baker, M ;
Gompers, PA .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (02) :569-598
[8]  
Bebchuk L., 2004, Pay without Performance The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation
[9]   Executive compensation as an agency problem [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 17 (03) :71-92
[10]   Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JM ;
Walker, DI .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2002, 69 (03) :751-846