Determinants of successful collective management of forest resources: Evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations

被引:22
作者
Okumu, Boscow [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Muchapondwa, Edwin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, Private Bag Rondebosch, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm Technol & Social Sci, Lulea, Sweden
[3] Univ Nairobi Kenya, EfD Kenya Sch Econ, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Natl Treasury & Planning, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
PFM; Collective action; Participation; CFAs; PEOPLES PARTICIPATION; LOCAL INSTITUTIONS; IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; COMMON PROPERTY; GROUP-SIZE; COOPERATION; GOVERNANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102122
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The collective participation of local communities in the management and utilization of forest resources is now widely accepted as a possible solution to the failure of centralized, top-down approaches to forest conservation. Under such initiatives, communities in Kenya have organized themselves into Community Forest Associations (CFAs). Despite the proliferation of CFAs, forest conservation outcomes have been mixed. Little is known about the factors that influence the success of collective action in forest conservation. Using data from 518 households and 22 CFAs within the Mau forest conservancy, this study employed regression techniques to analyze factors that influence household participation in CFA activities. Further, the study investigated the determinants of successful collective action, as measured by the percentage of forest cover and the number of reported cases of vandalism of forest resources. The relationship between household participation and success of collective action was also established. Collective action is more successful where household participation is high, the associations are initiated by the communities themselves, the associations interact frequently with government departments, and the forest cover is low, among other factors. The factors that influence the level of household participation are also identified.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Adhikari B., 2004, Community forestry in Nepal: management rules and distribution of benefits
[2]   Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Chhatre, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (01) :149-166
[3]   Decentralization and participation: The governance of common pool resources in Nepal's Terai [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gupta, K .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) :1101-1114
[4]   Group size and collective action - Third-parts monitoring in common-pool resources [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Goyal, S .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2001, 34 (01) :63-93
[5]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[6]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[7]  
Agrawal A., 2007, International Journal of the Commons, V1, P111
[8]  
Agrawal A., 2000, People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance, P57
[9]   Determinants of the process and outcomes of household participation in collaborative forest management in Ghana: A quantitative test of a community resilience model [J].
Akamani, Kofi ;
Hall, Troy Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 147 :1-11
[10]   Evaluating the fulfillment of the principles of collective action in practice: A case study from Galicia (NW Spain) [J].
Allo, Maria ;
Loureiro, Maria L. .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 73 :1-9