A real options model for renewable energy investment with application to solar photovoltaic power generation in China

被引:144
作者
Zhang, M. M.
Zhou, P. [1 ]
Zhou, D. Q.
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Yudao St, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable energy; Solar PV power generation; Uncertainty; Real options; FEED-IN TARIFFS; UNCERTAINTY; POLICY; VALUATION; CAPTURE; CHOICE; MARKET; TECHNOLOGY; HYDROPOWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a real options model for evaluating renewable energy investment by considering uncertain factors such as CO2 price, non-renewable energy cost, investment cost and market price of electricity. A phase-out mechanism is built into the model to reflect the long-term changes of subsidy policy. We apply the proposed model to empirically evaluate the investment value and optimal timing for solar photovoltaic power generation in China. Our empirical results show that the current investment environment in China may not be able to attract immediate investment, while the development of carbon market helps advance the optimal investment time. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the dynamics of investment value and optimal timing under the changes of unit generating capacity, subsidy level, market price of electricity, CO2 price and investment cost. It is found that the high investment cost and the volatility of electricity and CO2 prices, are not conducive to attract immediate investment. Instead, increasing the level of subsidy, promoting technological progress and maintaining the stability of market are useful to stimulate investment. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 226
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments
    Abadie, Luis M.
    Chamorro, Jose M.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (06) : 2992 - 3015
  • [2] Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects
    Bockman, Thor
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    Juliussen, Erik
    Langhammer, Havard J.
    Revdal, Ingemar
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 190 (01) : 255 - 267
  • [3] Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach
    Boomsma, Trine Krogh
    Meade, Nigel
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 220 (01) : 225 - 237
  • [4] Chinese photovoltaic Industry Alliance (CPIA) China Resources and Energy Association (CREIA), 2013, CHIN PHOT DEV REP
  • [5] Optimizing the level of renewable electric R&D expenditures using real options analysis
    Davis, GA
    Owens, B
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (15) : 1589 - 1608
  • [6] Real options approach to renewable energy investments in Mongolia
    Detert, Neal
    Kotani, Koji
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 56 : 136 - 150
  • [7] DIXIT AK, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P105
  • [8] Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN
  • [9] Evaluating coal bed methane investment in China based on a real options model
    Fan, Ying
    Mo, Jian-Lei
    Zhu, Lei
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2013, 38 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [10] A real options based model and its application to China's overseas oil investment decisions
    Fan, Ying
    Zhu, Lei
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (03) : 627 - 637