Institutional trust and emergency preparedness: Perceptions of Covid 19 crisis management in Sweden

被引:19
作者
Bengtsson, Rikard [1 ]
Brommesson, Douglas [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Box 52, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Linnaeus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Vaxjo, Sweden
关键词
Covid; 19; crisis management; emergency preparedness; Sweden; trust;
D O I
10.1111/1468-5973.12391
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Covid 19 pandemic has put the issue of public trust at the centre of political analysis. This article inquires into the level of public trust in Sweden concerning current crisis management as well as preparedness for future crises. The empirical basis for this study consists of unique data generated through two surveys on the Covid 19 virus conducted during 2020 in Sweden. Respondents were asked to assess their trust in different actors' crisis management. In addition, the first survey asked about how the actions of different actors impact on the forward-oriented trust held in Swedish emergency preparedness for a future severe crisis. Four key findings stand out. First, the results display rather weak levels of interpersonal trust. Second, a surprisingly high level of institutional trust can be found during the initial phase of the pandemic. Simultaneously we see somewhat decreasing levels of trust later during the pandemic. The results include interesting variations across age, gender and education. Third, relating the results to earlier research on trust in Sweden, the results contain indications of stable trust levels despite the all but stable contextual conditions. Fourth, the analysis shows important variations in trust levels among different institutions and layers of government.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 491
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Standard Eurobarometer 94 - Winter 2020-2021
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust, OECD Public Governance Review, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264268920-EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Public Performance and Management Review, DOI DOI 10.2307/3381308
[4]   Monotonous or pluralistic public discourse? Reason-giving and dissent in Denmark's and Sweden's early 2020 COVID-19 responses [J].
Baekkeskov, Erik ;
Rubin, Olivier ;
Oberg, PerOla .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 28 (08) :1321-1343
[5]  
Bengtsson R., 2020, SOM UNDERSOKNINGEN C
[6]   Building Institutional Trust Through Service Experiences-Private Versus Public Provision Matter [J].
Berg, Monika ;
Johansson, Tobias .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2020, 30 (02) :290-306
[7]  
Brommesson D., 2019, KUNGL KRIGSVETENSKAP, V4
[8]  
Brommesson D., 2021, Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, V123, P141
[9]   The coronavirus crisis-crisis communication, meaning-making, and reputation management [J].
Christensen, Tom ;
Laegreid, Per .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 23 (05) :713-729
[10]   Risk cultures and dominant approaches towards disasters in seven European countries [J].
Cornia, Alessio ;
Dressel, Kerstin ;
Pfeil, Patricia .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2016, 19 (03) :288-304