The perceived functions of linguistic risk quantifiers and their effect on risk, negativity perception and decision making

被引:40
作者
Juanchich, Marie [1 ]
Sirota, Miroslav [2 ]
Butler, Christina Lea
机构
[1] Kingston Univ London, Kingston Business Sch, Ctr Res Employment Skills & Soc CRESS, Kingston Upon Thames KT2 7LB, Surrey, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth Sci, London, England
关键词
Verbal probabilities; Probability terms; Risk perception; Hearer-face-management; Speaker-face-management; Likelihood-communication; Politeness; SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES; SEVERITY; EVENTS; COMMUNICATION; PREFERENCE; POLITENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
When someone is told: "it is possible that you will lose your investment", "possible" can be interpreted as plainly reflecting the speaker's degree of certainty (i.e., likelihood-communication device) or as tactfully communicating the probable occurrence of losses (i.e., hearer-face-management device). We suggest that risk quantifiers can also serve the speaker's interest by decreasing the chance of being blamed for an incorrect wrongful prediction (i.e., speaker-face-management device). In five experiments, we investigate how individuals interpret risk quantifiers and the effect of their interpretations on risk perception. Results show that speaker-face-management is the most frequent interpretation in both negative and positive outcome predictions, for different probability terms, and in different cultures. Results consistently show that device interpretation determines risk judgment, negativity perceptions and decision making. Results are discussed within the framework of politeness theory and implications for risk communication are reviewed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 81
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, UNDERSTANDING CULTUR
[2]  
Bar-Hillel M., 1995, Thinking Reasoning, V1, P71, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13546789508256906, 10.1080/13546789508256906]
[3]  
Bonnefon J. F., 2005, P 27 ANN C COGN SCI
[4]   Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases [J].
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois ;
Villejoubert, Gaelle .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (09) :747-751
[5]   The Risk of Polite Misunderstandings [J].
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois ;
Feeney, Aidan ;
De Neys, Wim .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (05) :321-324
[6]  
Brown Penelope., 1978, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage
[7]   Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports [J].
Budescu, David V. ;
Por, Han-Hui ;
Broomell, Stephen B. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 113 (02) :181-200
[8]   Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [J].
Budescu, David V. ;
Broomell, Stephen ;
Por, Han-Hui .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (03) :299-308
[9]  
Coffman E., 1967, Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior
[10]  
Eelen G, 2001, CRITIQUE POLITENESS