The politics of social protection: what do we get from a 'social contract' approach?

被引:33
|
作者
Hickey, Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Inst Dev Policy & Management, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT | 2011年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
social contract; social protection; politics; Africa; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/02255189.2011.647447
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
There have been growing calls to reframe the politics of poverty reduction and of social protection in particular, in terms of extending the 'social contract' to the poorest groups. This is often understood as relocating social protection within a broader project politics of rights and justice as opposed to patronage. However, such calls belie the serious differences that exist between different strands of social contract and between the forms of social protection that might emerge from these different approaches. The experience in Africa suggests that contractual approaches may take regressive as well as progressive forms. It seems unlikely that international development agencies could promote progressive social contracts around social protection without significant reforms to the way in which aid currently works.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 438
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条