The Expertise Effect on Web Accessibility Evaluation Methods

被引:49
作者
Brajnik, Giorgio [1 ]
Yesilada, Yeliz [2 ]
Harper, Simon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dipartimento Matemat & Informat, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Middle E Tech Univ, Comp Engn Programme, TR-10 Mersin, Turkey
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Web Ergon Lab, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION | 2011年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
USABILITY EVALUATION;
D O I
10.1080/07370024.2011.601670
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Web accessibility means that disabled people can effectively perceive, understand, navigate, and interact with the web. Web accessibility evaluation methods are needed to validate the accessibility of web pages. However, the role of subjectivity and of expertise in such methods is unknown and has not previously been studied. This article investigates the effect of expertise in web accessibility evaluation methods by conducting a Barrier Walkthrough (BW) study with 19 expert and 57 nonexpert judges. The BW method is an evaluation method that can be used to manually assess the accessibility of web pages for different user groups such as motor impaired, low vision, blind, and mobile users. Our results show that expertise matters, and even though the effect of expertise varies depending on the metric used to measure quality, the level of expertise is an important factor in the quality of accessibility evaluation of web pages. In brief, when pages are evaluated with nonexperts, we observe a drop in validity and reliability. We also observe a negative monotonic relationship between number of judges and reproducibility: more evaluators mean more diverse outputs. After five experts, reproducibility stabilizes, but this is not the case with nonexperts. The ability to detect all the problems increases with the number of judges: With 3 experts all problems can be found, but for such a level 14 nonexperts are needed. Even though our data show that experts rated pages differently, the difference is quite small. Finally, compared to nonexperts, experts spent much less time and the variability among them is smaller, they were significantly more confident, and they rated themselves as being more productive. The article discusses practical implications regarding how BW results should be interpreted, how to recruit evaluators, and what happens when more than one evaluator is hired. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Human-Computer Interaction for statistical details and additional measures for this article.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 283
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Usability Evaluation Methods for Gesture-Based Games: A Systematic Review
    Simor, Fernando Winckler
    Brum, Manoela Rogofski
    Ebertz Schmidt, Jaison Dairon
    Rieder, Rafael
    Bertoletti De Marchi, Ana Carolina
    JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, 2016, 4 (02):
  • [42] Integrating work environment considerations into usability evaluation methods -: the ADA approach
    Åborg, C
    Sandblad, B
    Gulliksen, J
    Lif, M
    INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2003, 15 (03) : 453 - 471
  • [43] Visual application for the analysis of web-based information systems usage: A preliminary usability evaluation
    Santos, BS
    Zamfir, F
    Ferreira, C
    Mealha, O
    Nunes, J
    EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION VISUALISATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 812 - 818
  • [44] Usability evaluation for a web-based public participatory GIS: A case study in Canmore, Alberta
    Meng, Yunliang
    Malczewski, Jacek
    CYBERGEO-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2009,
  • [45] Students' usability evaluation of a Web-based tutorial program for college biology problem solving
    Kim, H. S.
    Prevost, L.
    Lemons, P. P.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2015, 31 (04) : 362 - 377
  • [46] Evaluation of User-Subjective Web Interface Similarity with Kansei Engineering-Based ANN
    Bakaev, Maxim
    Khvorostov, Vladimir
    Heil, Sebastian
    Gaedke, Martin
    2017 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (REW), 2017, : 125 - 131
  • [47] Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: implementation of the partial concurrent thinking aloud technique
    Federici Stefano
    Simone Borsci
    Gianluca Stamerra
    Cognitive Processing, 2010, 11 : 263 - 272
  • [48] Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: implementation of the partial concurrent thinking aloud technique
    Stefano, Federici
    Borsci, Simone
    Stamerra, Gianluca
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2010, 11 (03) : 263 - 272
  • [49] Web-Based Learning Environment: A Theory-Based Design Process for Development and Evaluation
    Nam, Chang S.
    Smith-Jackson, Tonya L.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-RESEARCH, 2007, 6 : 23 - 43
  • [50] Capturing Usability Problems for People Living With Dementia by Applying the DEMIGNED Principles in Usability Evaluation Methods: Mixed Methods Study
    Engelsma, Thomas
    Heijmink, Simone
    Hendriksen, Heleen M. A.
    Visser, Leonie N. C.
    Lemstra, Afina W.
    Jaspers, Monique W. M.
    Peute, Linda W. P.
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 11