The Expertise Effect on Web Accessibility Evaluation Methods

被引:49
|
作者
Brajnik, Giorgio [1 ]
Yesilada, Yeliz [2 ]
Harper, Simon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Dipartimento Matemat & Informat, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Middle E Tech Univ, Comp Engn Programme, TR-10 Mersin, Turkey
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Web Ergon Lab, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION | 2011年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
USABILITY EVALUATION;
D O I
10.1080/07370024.2011.601670
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Web accessibility means that disabled people can effectively perceive, understand, navigate, and interact with the web. Web accessibility evaluation methods are needed to validate the accessibility of web pages. However, the role of subjectivity and of expertise in such methods is unknown and has not previously been studied. This article investigates the effect of expertise in web accessibility evaluation methods by conducting a Barrier Walkthrough (BW) study with 19 expert and 57 nonexpert judges. The BW method is an evaluation method that can be used to manually assess the accessibility of web pages for different user groups such as motor impaired, low vision, blind, and mobile users. Our results show that expertise matters, and even though the effect of expertise varies depending on the metric used to measure quality, the level of expertise is an important factor in the quality of accessibility evaluation of web pages. In brief, when pages are evaluated with nonexperts, we observe a drop in validity and reliability. We also observe a negative monotonic relationship between number of judges and reproducibility: more evaluators mean more diverse outputs. After five experts, reproducibility stabilizes, but this is not the case with nonexperts. The ability to detect all the problems increases with the number of judges: With 3 experts all problems can be found, but for such a level 14 nonexperts are needed. Even though our data show that experts rated pages differently, the difference is quite small. Finally, compared to nonexperts, experts spent much less time and the variability among them is smaller, they were significantly more confident, and they rated themselves as being more productive. The article discusses practical implications regarding how BW results should be interpreted, how to recruit evaluators, and what happens when more than one evaluator is hired. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Human-Computer Interaction for statistical details and additional measures for this article.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 283
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Architecture for Multiple Web Accessibility Evaluation Environments
    Fernandes, Nadia
    Lopes, Rui
    Carrico, Luis
    UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: DESIGN FOR ALL AND EINCLUSION, PT 1, 2011, 6765 : 206 - 214
  • [22] Integrating Accessibility Evaluation into Web Engineering Processes
    Power, Christopher
    Freire, Andre Pimenta
    Petrie, Helen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND WEB ENGINEERING, 2009, 4 (04) : 54 - 77
  • [23] A review of evaluation tools for web content accessibility
    Prim, M
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES : EXPLORING EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 23 - 29
  • [24] SUPPORTING NAVIGATION ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS IN WEB ENGINEERING METHODS
    Moreno, Lourdes
    Valverde, Francisco
    Martinez, Paloma
    Pastor, Oscar
    JOURNAL OF WEB ENGINEERING, 2013, 12 (3-4): : 181 - 202
  • [25] Comparing Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools and Evaluating the Accessibility of Webpages: Proposed Frameworks
    Alsaeedi, Abdullah
    INFORMATION, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [26] Evaluation of Accessibility and Accessibility Audit Methods for e-Governance Portals
    Bhagat, Saidarshan
    Joshi, Padmaja
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE (ICEGOV2019), 2019, : 220 - 226
  • [27] A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites
    Hackett, S
    Parmanto, B
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (03) : 281 - 294
  • [28] Analysis and Evaluation of the Accessibility to Visual Information in Web Pages
    Issa, Youssef Bou
    Mojahid, Mustapha
    Oriola, Bernard
    Vigouroux, Nadine
    COMPUTERS HELPING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, PROCEEDINGS, PT 1, 2010, 6179 : 437 - 443
  • [29] A Declarative Model for Web Content Accessibility Evaluation Process
    Ara, Jinat
    Sik-Lanyi, Cecilia
    COMPUTERS HELPING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, PT I, ICCHP 2024, 2024, 14750 : 84 - 92
  • [30] An evaluation of web-based voting usability and accessibility
    Kristin Skeide Fuglerud
    Till Halbach Røssvoll
    Universal Access in the Information Society, 2012, 11 : 359 - 373