Some Cautions on the Use of Instrumental Variables Estimators in Outcomes Research: How Bias in Instrumental Variables Estimators Is Affected by Instrument Strength, Instrument Contamination, and Sample Size

被引:45
作者
Crown, William H. [1 ]
Henk, Henry J. [2 ]
Vanness, David J. [3 ]
机构
[1] OptumInsight Life Sci, Waltham, MA USA
[2] OptumInsight Life Sci, Eden Prairie, MN USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
关键词
bias; endogeneity; instrumental variables; RISK-ADJUSTMENT; HETEROGENEITY; MORTALITY; SELECTION; MODELS; CARE; LOG;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the performance of instrumental variables (IV) and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression under a range of conditions likely to be encountered in empirical research. Methods: A series of simulation analyses are carried out to compare estimation error between OLS and IV when the independent variable of interest is endogenous. The simulations account for a range of situations that may be encountered by researchers in actual practice-varying degrees of endogeneity, instrument strength, instrument contamination, and sample size. The intent of this article is to provide researchers with more intuition with respect to how important these factors are from an empirical standpoint. Results: Notably, the simulations indicate a greater potential for inferential error when using IV than OLS in all but the most ideal circumstances. Conclusions: Researchers should be cautious when using IV methods. These methods are valuable in testing for the presence of endogeneity but only under the most ideal circumstances are they likely to produce estimates with less estimation error than OLS.
引用
收藏
页码:1078 / 1084
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   DOES COMPULSORY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AFFECT SCHOOLING AND EARNINGS [J].
ANGRIST, JD ;
KRUEGER, AB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1991, 106 (04) :979-1014
[2]   Building a Stronger Instrument in an Observational Study of Perinatal Care for Premature Infants [J].
Baiocchi, Mike ;
Small, Dylan S. ;
Lorch, Scott ;
Rosenbaum, Paul R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (492) :1285-1296
[3]   Comparing alternative models: log vs Cox proportional hazard? [J].
Basu, A ;
Manning, WG ;
Mullahy, J .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (08) :749-765
[4]   Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: An application to treatments of breast cancer patients [J].
Basu, Anirban ;
Heckman, James J. ;
Navarro-Lozano, Salvador ;
Urzua, Sergio .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (11) :1133-1157
[5]   PROBLEMS WITH INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES ESTIMATION WHEN THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INSTRUMENTS AND THE ENDOGENOUS EXPLANATORY VARIABLE IS WEAK [J].
BOUND, J ;
JAEGER, DA ;
BAKER, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) :443-450
[6]   Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Rassen, Jeremy A. ;
Schneeweiss, Sebastian .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 (06) :537-554
[7]   Heterogeneity and the interpretation of treatment effect estimates from risk adjustment and instrumental variable methods [J].
Brooks, John M. ;
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (10) :S123-S130
[8]   Effect of dialysis center profit-status on patient survival: A comparison of risk-adjustment and instrumental variable approaches [J].
Brooks, John M. ;
Irwin, Christopher P. ;
Hunsicker, Lawrence G. ;
Flanigan, Michael J. ;
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A. ;
Pendergast, Jane F. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (06) :2267-2289
[9]  
Christophides L. N., 1995, Aspects of Labour Market Behaviour: Essays in Honour of John Vanderkamp, P201
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond