Comparative Analysis of the Native Microbiota in gammaCop Mutant versus Wild-Type Genetic Background of Drosophila melanogaster

被引:1
作者
Barbu, Ilda Czobor [1 ]
Ratiu, Attila Cristian [2 ]
Florescu, Ana Maria [2 ]
Chifiriuc, Mariana Carmen [1 ,3 ]
Ecovoiu, Alexandru Al. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Res Inst, Earth Environm & Life Sci Div, ICUB, Spl Independentei 91-95, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Univ Bucharest, Fac Biol, Dept Genet, Intrarea Portocalelor 1-3, Bucharest 60101, Romania
[3] Univ Bucharest, Dept Bot & Microbiol, Fac Biol, Intrarea Portocalelor 1-3, Bucharest 60101, Romania
来源
ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS | 2018年 / 23卷 / 06期
关键词
bacterial low diversity; Drosophila melanogaster; experimental model; gammaCop; mutant allele; native microbiota; IMMUNE HOMEOSTASIS; MODEL; HOST; DIVERSITY; MUTUALISM; BACTERIA; FLY;
D O I
10.26327/RBL2018.243
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Drosophila melanogaster represents a genetically tractable model for studying the mechanisms used by the infectious microorganisms to colonize healthy individuals. Since native microbiota plays an important role in host resistance to colonization, our aim was to study the influence of the genetic background on D. melanogaster microbiota diversity, as a prerequisite for using different lines in experimental infection challenge assays. In this purpose, we have assessed the microbiota of D. melanogaster wild-type Oregon and gammaCop (gamma Cop) mutants males, by genetic and culture dependent methods. The cultivable fly-derived microbiota was estimated by viable cell counts. Each morphological type of bacterium was considered for identification through biochemical tests. The diversity of the microbial communities was assessed also by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). Our study emphasizes that both wild-type and mutant D. melanogaster males harbor a low-diversity bacterial community, highlighting the potential of this system to dissect the complex cellular and molecular interactions that occur between a eukaryotic host and its microbiota. The commonly found taxa were primarily represented by Enterobacteriaceae family (Providencia sp., Serratia sp. and Escherichia sp.) and the Bacilli class. The ARDRA approach highlighted a prevalence of 75% of the Enterobacteriaceae, especially P. rettgeri and E. coli, followed by Lactobacillaceae and Enterococcaceae. The amount of the cultivable bacteria in D. melanogaster varied quantitatively among different genetic backgrounds, gradually decreasing from Oregon to heterozygous and homozygous gamma Cop(14a) males. Our results suggest that gamma Cop gene is involved in configuring the profile of native microbiota of D. melanogaster, an aspect that should be considered when wild-type versus specific mutant D. melanogaster lines are used as models in infectious pathogenesis experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:14235 / 14243
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Comparative Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Gut Microbiota with Respect to Host Strain, Sex, and Age
    Han, Gangsik
    Lee, Hyo Jung
    Jeong, Sang Eun
    Jeon, Che Ok
    Hyun, Seogang
    MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 74 (01) : 207 - 216
  • [2] Systems Genomics of Metabolic Phenotypes in Wild-Type Drosophila melanogaster
    Reed, Laura K.
    Lee, Kevin
    Zhang, Zhi
    Rashid, Lubna
    Poe, Amy
    Hsieh, Benjamin
    Deighton, Nigel
    Glassbrook, Norm
    Bodmer, Rolf
    Gibson, Greg
    GENETICS, 2014, 197 (02) : 781 - U630
  • [3] The expression of Drosophila melanogaster Hox gene Ultrabithorax is not overtly regulated by the intronic long noncoding RNA lncRNA:PS4 in a wild-type genetic background
    Hermann, Anita
    Kosman, Dave
    McGinnis, William
    Tour, Ella
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [4] THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SENSORY NEURON PATTERN IN THE ANTENNAL DISK OF WILD-TYPE AND MUTANT (LZ3, SSA) DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    LIENHARD, MC
    STOCKER, RF
    DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 112 (04): : 1063 - 1075
  • [5] REGULATION OF JUVENILE-HORMONE SYNTHESIS IN WILD-TYPE AND APTEROUS MUTANT DROSOPHILA
    ALTARATZ, M
    APPLEBAUM, SW
    RICHARD, DS
    GILBERT, LI
    SEGAL, D
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1991, 81 (1-3) : 205 - 216
  • [6] Comparative analysis of the integument transcriptomes of the black dilute mutant and the wild-type silkworm Bombyx mori
    Wu, Songyuan
    Tong, Xiaoling
    Peng, Chenxing
    Xiong, Gao
    Lu, Kunpeng
    Hu, Hai
    Tan, Duan
    Li, Chunlin
    Han, Minjin
    Lu, Cheng
    Dai, Fangyin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [7] Patterned epidermal cell death in wild-type and segment polarity mutant Drosophila embryos
    Pazdera, TM
    Janardhan, P
    Minden, JS
    DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 125 (17): : 3427 - 3436
  • [8] A mild heat stress increases resistance to heat of dFOXO Drosophila melanogaster mutants but less in wild-type flies
    Le Bourg, Eric
    BIOGERONTOLOGY, 2021, 22 (02) : 237 - 251
  • [9] Two promoters integrate multiple enhancer inputs to drive wild-type knirps expression in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo
    Li, Lily
    Waymack, Rachel
    Gad, Mario
    Wunderlich, Zeba
    GENETICS, 2021, 219 (04)
  • [10] Wild-type and insecticide-resistant homo-oligomeric GABA receptors of Drosophila melanogaster stably expressed in a Drosophila cell line
    Buckingham, SD
    Matsuda, K
    Hosie, AM
    Baylis, HA
    Squire, MD
    Lansdell, SJ
    Millar, NS
    Sattelle, DB
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 35 (9-10) : 1393 - 1401