Portfolio selection by cumulative prospect theory and its comparison with mean-variance model

被引:3
作者
Srivastava, Sweksha [1 ]
Aggarwal, Abha [1 ]
Mehra, Aparna [2 ]
机构
[1] Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univ, Univ Sch Basic & Appl Sci, Delhi 110075, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Math, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Cumulative prospect theory; Quadratic value function; Utility function; Mean-variance optimization model; OPTIMIZATION; AVERSION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s41066-021-00302-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The modeling of risk and uncertainty in finance requires the consideration of several factors. One of the main factors in modeling is the decision-maker's attitude towards risk. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has emerged as an important approach for assessing the actions of decision-makers under uncertainty with ambiguity. Considerable experimental evidence indicates that human behavior can differ significantly from the conventional expected utility maximization paradigm. CPT has the ability to model the irrationality of the decision makers' behavior in real complex situations. This paper studies the portfolio selection problem based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT) risk criterion. We encounter two types of risks during problem handling, first internal (imposed by risk management departments) and second external (accredited regulatory institutions). Therefore, we propose a new CPT-based model for the portfolio selection problem under uncertainty with ambiguity. By taking some listed stocks from Nifty-50, the National Stock Exchange, India, as the study sample, the efficient frontier for the proposed CPT-based model is generated. The empirical analysis compares the classical Markowitz's mean-variance efficient frontier with mean-variance values obtained by the proposed CPT-based efficient frontier. We also compare the investment performance of the behavioral investor with that of a rational investor. A detailed numerical illustration is presented to substantiate the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 916
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Coherent measures of risk [J].
Artzner, P ;
Delbaen, F ;
Eber, JM ;
Heath, D .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) :203-228
[2]  
Barber B.M., 1999, Financial Analysts Journal, V55, P41, DOI DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V55.N6.2313
[3]   Prospect theory and asset prices [J].
Barberis, N ;
Huang, M ;
Santos, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :1-53
[4]   Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices [J].
Barberis, Nicholas ;
Huang, Ming .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (05) :2066-2100
[5]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[6]   Static portfolio choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory [J].
Bernard, Carole ;
Ghossoub, Mario .
MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (04) :277-306
[7]   Making prospect theory fit for finance [J].
De Giorgi, Enrico ;
Hens, Thorsten .
FINANCIAL MARKETS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2006, 20 (03) :339-360
[8]  
Gazioglu S., 2011, Applied Financial Economics, V21, P1581
[9]   The impact of CAP policy in farmer's behavior - A modeling approach using the Cumulative Prospect Theory [J].
Godinho Coelho, Luis Alberto ;
Pacheco Pires, Cesaltina Maria ;
Dionisio, Andreia Teixeira ;
da Conceicao Serrao, Amilcar Joaquim .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2012, 34 (01) :81-98
[10]   A New Method of Portfolio Optimization Under Cumulative Prospect Theory [J].
Gong, Chao ;
Xu, Chunhui ;
Ando, Masakazu ;
Xi, Xiangming .
TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 23 (01) :75-86