Worldwide Research Trends on Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2004-2020): Suggestions for Researchers

被引:41
作者
Deng, Pin [1 ]
Shi, Hongshuo [2 ]
Pan, Xuyue [1 ]
Liang, Huan [1 ]
Wang, Shulong [1 ]
Wu, Junde [1 ]
Zhang, Wei [3 ]
Huang, Fasen [1 ]
Sun, Xiaojie [1 ]
Zhu, Hanjie [1 ]
Chen, Zhaojun [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ, Chinese Med Third Affiliated Hosp, Dept Hand & Foot Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Coll Tradit Chinese Med, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Univ, Chinese Med Third Affiliated Hosp, Orthopaed Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; SCIENCE; SCOPUS; RISK; WEB;
D O I
10.1155/2022/7991031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the devastating complications of diabetes. It has high mortality and disability rates. The number of research articles on DFUs has increased. This study was designed to explore the global trends and research hotspots of DFUs to benefit researchers in shaping future research directions. Methods. Literatures relating to DFU from 2004 to 2020 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-expanded) of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The current status of DFU research (including publications, journals, the performances of relevant countries, institutions, and authors and the research trends and hotspots of DFU) was analyzed with the WoSCC. VOSviewer v1.6.10.0 was utilised for cocitation, coauthorship, cooccurrence analyses, and bibliographic coupling. Results. A total of 5869 publications on DFUs were retrieved. We performed a longitudinal review of publications over 17 years: 4500 articles and 865 review articles on DFUs published from 2004 to 2020 were analyzed. The total citation was 107,296. The USA (n=1866), England (n=606), and China (n=599) were the three largest contributors. The University of Washington had the greatest number of publications within this time period (n=103), and it had the most cooperative units and was in the core position in all research institutions, followed by the University of Manchester (n=94) and the University of Miami (n=92). Armstrong DG (91/1.69%) and Lavery LA (55/1.19%) should be regarded as scholars who have made outstanding contributions. The top journal with the greatest total link strength was Diabetes Care. Analysis showed that the global research hotspots of DFU focused on lower limb amputation, diabetic foot infection, and treatment and management of DFU. Studies on osteomyelitis, wound therapy and management, multidisciplinary integration and mechanism of DFUs, and its related diseases are the research fronts that should be closely watched in the future. Conclusions. This study revealed the current research status and hotspots in the domain of DFU over the past 17 years, which can help researchers to further pinpoint potential perspectives on hot topics and research frontiers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Validation of a diabetic wound classification system - The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation [J].
Armstrong, DG ;
Lavery, LA ;
Harkless, LB .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (05) :855-859
[2]  
Bakkalbasi Nisa, 2006, Biomed Digit Libr, V3, P7, DOI 10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
[3]   Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling Network Effects on Citations [J].
Biscaro, Claudio ;
Giupponi, Carlo .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06)
[4]   Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911) [J].
Bolla, Michel ;
van Poppel, Hein ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
Vekemans, Kris ;
Da Pozzo, Luigi ;
de Reijke, Theo M. ;
Verbaeys, Antony ;
Bosset, Jean-Francois ;
van Velthoven, Roland ;
Colombel, Marc ;
van de Beek, Cees ;
Verhagen, Paul ;
van den Bergh, Alphonsus ;
Sternberg, Cora ;
Gasser, Thomas ;
van Tienhoven, Geertjan ;
Scalliet, Pierre ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Collette, Laurence .
LANCET, 2012, 380 (9858) :2018-2027
[5]   The evolution of the field of legal medicine: A holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis [J].
Demir, Emre ;
Yasar, Eda ;
Ozkocak, Vahdet ;
Yildirim, Engin .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE, 2020, 69
[6]   The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? [J].
Ellegaard, Ole ;
Wallin, Johan A. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (03) :1809-1831
[7]   Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses [J].
Falagas, Matthew E. ;
Pitsouni, Eleni I. ;
Malietzis, George A. ;
Pappas, Georgios .
FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (02) :338-342
[8]   Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use [J].
Fonseca e Fonseca, Bruna de Paula ;
Sampaio, Ricardo Barros ;
de Araujo Fonseca, Marcus Vinicius ;
Zicker, Fabio .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
[9]   The primary total knee arthroplasty: a global analysis [J].
Gao, Jiaxiang ;
Xing, Dan ;
Dong, Shengjie ;
Lin, Jianhao .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
[10]   Co-Occurrence of Health Conditions during Childhood: Longitudinal Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) [J].
Hesketh, Kathryn R. ;
Law, Catherine ;
Bedford, Helen ;
Hope, Steven .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06)