Dimensionality and scale properties of the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the DiaDDzoB study

被引:21
作者
de Cock, Evi S. A. [1 ,2 ]
Emons, Wilco H. M. [1 ,3 ]
Nefs, Giesje [1 ]
Pop, Victor J. M. [1 ]
Pouwer, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Med Psychol & Neuropsychol, Ctr Res Psychol Somat Dis CoRPS, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Dev & Clin Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; CO-MORBID DEPRESSION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTNATAL DEPRESSION; EUROPEAN DEPRESSION; EMOTIONAL-PROBLEMS; RISK-FACTORS; CES-D; VALIDATION; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-244X-11-141
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Depression is a common complication in type 2 diabetes (DM2), affecting 10-30% of patients. Since depression is underrecognized and undertreated, it is important that reliable and validated depression screening tools are available for use in patients with DM2. The Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) is a widely used method for screening depression. However, there is still debate about the dimensionality of the test. Furthermore, the EDS was originally developed to screen for depression in postpartum women. Empirical evidence that the EDS has comparable measurement properties in both males and females suffering from diabetes is lacking however. Methods: In a large sample (N = 1,656) of diabetes patients, we examined: (1) dimensionality; (2) gender-related item bias; and (3) the screening properties of the EDS using factor analysis and item response theory. Results: We found evidence that the ten EDS items constitute a scale that is essentially one dimensional and has adequate measurement properties. Three items showed differential item functioning (DIF), two of them showed substantial DIF. However, at the scale level, DIF had no practical impact. Anhedonia (the inability to be able to laugh or enjoy) and sleeping problems were the most informative indicators for being able to differentiate between the diagnostic groups of mild and severe depression. Conclusions: The EDS constitutes a sound scale for measuring an attribute of general depression. Persons can be reliably measured using the sum score. Screening rules for mild and severe depression are applicable to both males and females.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ali, S. ;
Stone, M. A. ;
Peters, J. L. ;
Davies, M. J. ;
Khunti, K. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (11) :1165-1173
[2]   Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2009 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 :S13-S61
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Differential Item Functioning
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of modern item response theory, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
[6]   Measuring depression in women around menopausal age. Towards a validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale [J].
Becht, MC ;
Van Erp, CF ;
Teeuwisse, TM ;
Van Heck, GL ;
Van Son, MJ ;
Pop, VJ .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 63 (1-3) :209-213
[7]   Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy [J].
Bergink, Veerle ;
Kooistra, Libbe ;
Lambregtse-van den Berg, Mijke P. ;
Wijnen, Henny ;
Bunevicius, Robertas ;
van Baar, Anneloes ;
Pop, Victor .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2011, 70 (04) :385-389
[8]   Screening for postnatal depression - Validation of the Norwegian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression [J].
Berle, JO ;
Aarre, TF ;
Mykletun, A ;
Dahl, AA ;
Holsten, F .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2003, 76 (1-3) :151-156
[9]  
BJELLAND I, 2002, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V0052
[10]   Predictors of incident major depression in diabetic outpatients with subthreshold depression [J].
Bot, Mariska ;
Pouwer, Francois ;
Ormel, Johan ;
Slaets, Joris P. J. ;
de Jonge, Peter .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (11) :1295-1301