Cohesion in human-autonomy teams: an approach for future research

被引:6
作者
Lakhmani, Shan G. [1 ]
Neubauer, Catherine [1 ]
Krausman, Andrea [1 ]
Fitzhugh, Sean M. [1 ]
Berg, Samantha K. [2 ]
Wright, Julia L. [1 ]
Rovira, Ericka [3 ]
Blackman, Jordan J. [3 ]
Schaefer, Kristin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Army DEVCOM Army Res Lab, Human Res & Engn Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Associated Univ, Oak Ridge, TN USA
[3] US Mil Acad West Point, Dept Behav Sci & Leadership, West Point, NY USA
关键词
Cohesion; human-autonomy teams; group dynamics; human-autonomy interaction; autonomous teammates; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; UNIT COHESION; GROUP COHESIVENESS; MENTAL-HEALTH; ADJUSTABLE AUTONOMY; JOB-SATISFACTION; DECISION-MAKING; TASK COHESION; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1080/1463922X.2022.2033876
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Cohesion is an important property of teams that can affect individual teammates and team outcomes. However, cohesion in teams that include autonomous systems as teammates is an underexplored topic. We examine the extant literature on cohesion in human teams, then build on that foundation to advance the understanding of cohesion in human-autonomy teams, both similarities and differences. We describe team cohesion, the various definitions, factors, dimensions and associated benefits and detriments. We discuss how that element may be affected when the team includes an autonomous teammate with each description. Finally, we identify specific factors of human-autonomy interaction that may be relevant to cohesion, then articulate future research questions critical to advancing science for effective human-autonomy teams. Relevance Statement:The human team literature has provided a foundation onto which human-autonomy team research can build, but the team dynamics, and subsequent states, established in multi-human teams are expected to differ in human-autonomy teams. This manuscript focuses on cohesion, one such state and synthesises elements of human team cohesion and human-autonomy interaction to detail expectations for cohesion in human-autonomy teams. These expectations can serve as a launch point for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 724
页数:38
相关论文
共 234 条
[11]  
Arakawa T., 2016, P MEAS BEH, P177
[12]   TRIAL VERIFICATION OF HUMAN RELIANCE ON AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF HUMAN FACTORS [J].
Arakawa, Toshiya .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2018, 14 (02) :491-501
[13]   Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Harrison, Spencer H. ;
Corley, Kevin G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 34 (03) :325-374
[14]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[15]  
Bauer W.E., 2016, Lightweight robots in manual assembly-best to start simply
[16]   Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations [J].
Beal, DJ ;
Cohen, RR ;
Burke, MJ ;
McLendon, CL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (06) :989-1004
[17]  
Bell S.T., 2015, Advances in Psychological Theory Methods and Practice, P181
[18]   Athletes' Perceptions of Role Acceptance in Interdependent Sport Teams [J].
Benson, Alex J. ;
Eys, Mark ;
Surya, Mark ;
Dawson, Kimberley ;
Schneider, Margaret .
SPORT PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 27 (03) :269-280
[19]  
Berg Samantha, 2021, Advances in Human Factors in Robots, Unmanned Systems and Cybersecurity. Proceedings of the AHFE 2021 Virtual Conferences on Human Factors in Robots, Drones and Unmanned Systems, and Human Factors in Cybersecurity. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (LNNS 268), P121, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-79997-7_15
[20]  
Bernier Emily P., 2010, 2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL 2010), P286, DOI 10.1109/DEVLRN.2010.5578828