Public attitudes and values in priority setting

被引:7
作者
Peacock, Stuart J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Res Ctr, Canadian Ctr Appl Res Canc Control ARCC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, British Columbia Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH | 2015年 / 4卷
关键词
HEALTH; DELIBERATION; CONTEXT; FRAMEWORK; CITIZENS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1186/s13584-015-0025-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There is growing recognition that critical decisions concerning investments in new health care technologies and services should incorporate society's values along with the scientific evidence. From a normative perspective, public engagement can help realize the democratic ideals of legitimacy, transparency, and accountability. On a more pragmatic level, public engagement can help stakeholders understand the degree of popular support for policy options, and may enhance public trust in decision-making processes. To better understand public attitudes and values relating to priority setting in health care, researchers and decision-makers will have to employ a range of quantitative and qualitative approaches, drawing on different disciplines and methodological traditions.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Key concepts in health care priority setting
    Hoedemaekers, R
    Dekkers, W
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2003, 11 (04) : 309 - 323
  • [32] Key Concepts in Health Care Priority Setting
    Rogeer Hoedemaekers
    Wim Dekkers
    Health Care Analysis, 2003, 11 : 309 - 323
  • [33] The Implications of Fundamental Cause Theory for Priority Setting
    Goldberg, Daniel S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (10) : 1839 - 1843
  • [34] Research priority setting in obesity: a systematic review
    Iqbal, Halima
    McEachan, Rosemary R. C.
    West, Jane
    Haith-Cooper, Melanie
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2023, 31 (08): : 1285 - 1301
  • [35] Institutional Priority-Setting for Novel Drugs and Therapeutics: A Qualitative Systematic Review
    Wang, Daniel E.
    Hassanein, Maram
    Razvi, Yasmeen
    Shaul, Randi Zlotnik
    Denburg, Avram
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 13
  • [36] The Political Economy of Public Values: A Case for the Public Sphere and Progressive Opportunity
    Bozeman, Barry
    Johnson, Japera
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 45 (01) : 61 - 85
  • [37] Patient and public involvement in priority-setting decisions in England's Transforming NHS: An interview study with Clinical Commissioning Groups in South London sustainability transformation partnerships
    Coultas, Clare
    Kieslich, Katharina
    Littlejohns, Peter
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (06) : 1223 - 1230
  • [38] UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions
    Cadwgan, Jill
    Goodwin, Jane
    Babcock, Barbara
    Brick, Molly
    Chin, Richard
    Easton, Ava
    Green, Ben
    Hannan, Siobhan
    Inward, Rhys P. D.
    Kinsella, Suzannah
    King, Callum
    Kurian, Manju A.
    Levine, Phillip
    Mallick, Andrew
    Parr, Jeremy
    Partridge, Carol Anne
    Amin, Sam
    Lumsden, Dan
    Cross, J. Helen
    Lim, Ming J.
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2024, 66 (12) : 1590 - 1599
  • [39] Aversion to health inequalities and priority setting in health care
    Bleichrodt, Han
    Crainich, David
    Eeckhoudt, Louis
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 27 (06) : 1594 - 1604
  • [40] Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods
    Peacock, Stuart
    Mitton, Craig
    Bate, Angela
    McCoy, Bonnie
    Donaldson, Cam
    HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 92 (2-3) : 124 - 132