Public attitudes and values in priority setting

被引:7
|
作者
Peacock, Stuart J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Res Ctr, Canadian Ctr Appl Res Canc Control ARCC, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, British Columbia Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
来源
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH | 2015年 / 4卷
关键词
HEALTH; DELIBERATION; CONTEXT; FRAMEWORK; CITIZENS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1186/s13584-015-0025-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There is growing recognition that critical decisions concerning investments in new health care technologies and services should incorporate society's values along with the scientific evidence. From a normative perspective, public engagement can help realize the democratic ideals of legitimacy, transparency, and accountability. On a more pragmatic level, public engagement can help stakeholders understand the degree of popular support for policy options, and may enhance public trust in decision-making processes. To better understand public attitudes and values relating to priority setting in health care, researchers and decision-makers will have to employ a range of quantitative and qualitative approaches, drawing on different disciplines and methodological traditions.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review
    Mitton, Craig
    Smith, Neale
    Peacock, Stuart
    Evoy, Brian
    Abelson, Julia
    HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 91 (03) : 219 - 228
  • [2] Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care
    Weale, Albert
    Kieslich, Katharina
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Tugendhaft, Aviva
    Tumilty, Emma
    Weerasuriya, Krisantha
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (05) : 736 - 750
  • [3] Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting: the relevance and roles of empirical studies exploring public values
    Gustavsson, Erik
    Lindblom, Lars
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, : 285 - 292
  • [4] Primary care patients' attitudes to priority setting in Sweden
    Arvidsson, Eva
    Andre, Malin
    Borgquist, Lars
    Lindstrom, Kjell
    Carlsson, Per
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2009, 27 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [6] Applying priority-setting frameworks: A review of public and vulnerable populations' participation in health-system priority setting
    Razavi, S. Donya
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    Wilson, Michael
    Abelson, Julia
    HEALTH POLICY, 2020, 124 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [7] Integrating public input into healthcare priority-setting decisions
    Mitton, Craig
    Smith, Neale
    Peacock, Stuart
    Evoy, Brian
    Abelson, Julia
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2011, 7 (03): : 327 - 343
  • [8] Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia
    Wiseman, V
    Mooney, G
    Berry, G
    Tang, KC
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (05) : 1001 - 1012
  • [9] Public engagement in priority-setting: Results from a pan-Canadian survey of decision-makers in cancer control
    Regier, Dean A.
    Bentley, Colene
    Mitton, Craig
    Bryan, Stirling
    Burgess, Michael M.
    Chesney, Ellen
    Coldman, Andy
    Gibson, Jennifer
    Hoch, Jeffrey
    Rahman, Syed
    Sabharwal, Mona
    Sawka, Carol
    Schuckel, Victoria
    Peacock, Stuart J.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 122 : 130 - 139
  • [10] Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature
    Manafo, Elizabeth
    Petermann, Lisa
    Vandall-Walker, Virginia
    Mason-Lai, Ping
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):