Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up

被引:36
作者
Aalto, Timo J. [1 ,2 ]
Leinonen, Ville [3 ]
Herno, Arto [4 ]
Alen, Markku [5 ,6 ]
Kroger, Heikki [7 ,8 ]
Turunen, Veli [7 ]
Savolainen, Sakari [3 ]
Saari, Tapani
Airaksinen, Olavi [4 ]
机构
[1] Kyyhkyla Rehabil Ctr, Mikkeli 50700, Finland
[2] Hosp Hallinto, Mikkeli 50700, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[4] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[5] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Oulu, Finland
[6] Univ Oulu, Inst Hlth Sci, Oulu, Finland
[7] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[8] Univ Eastern Finland UEF, Bone Cartilage Res Unit, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Lumbar stenosis; Surgery; Outcome; Rehabilitation; LOW-BACK-PAIN; LIFE DISSATISFACTION; YOUNGER AGE; SURGERY; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; FLEXIBILITY; INTENTION; MUSCLES; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-011-1781-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim was to study if postoperative rehabilitation improves functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Surgically treated LSS patients (n = 102) were randomized to rehabilitation-group (A) and "standard postoperative treatment"aEuro"group (B). Intervention for A-group started 3 months postoperatively, consisting of once a week outpatient visits for 12 weeks (1.5 h per visit; 1-6 patients per one physiotherapist). Physiotherapist guided stretching and strengthening exercises. A-group performed individually estimated exercises at those visits with guiding and at home up to 24-month postoperative follow-up. Physiotherapeutic guidance (12 times) was repeated after 12 months, in order to update exercises and motivate patients to keep training. For B-group, the "standard treatment" thus included normal postoperative treatment, or no treatment/self-management. Outcome measures were measured at the start and the end of the first physiotherapeutic intervention (3 and 6 months postoperatively), and at 12- and 24-month postoperative follow-ups. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0-100%) was the main outcome measure. The other outcome measures were back- and leg pain separately (NRS-11); satisfaction (7-point scale) and treadmill test (0-1,000 m; not at 6 month). The intervention consisting of 12 + 12 physiotherapeutic sessions with further home exercises did not influence the course ODI in the 24-month postoperative follow-up (p = 0.95 for ODI; "as-rehabilitated" analysis). No influence on any other outcome measures was observed. After LSS surgery, routinely performed outpatient rehabilitation did not improve functional outcome compared to standard treatment. In addition, it had no impact on the back and leg pain, satisfaction and walking ability.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1340
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] SURGERY FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS - ATTEMPTED METAANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE
    TURNER, JA
    ERSEK, M
    HERRON, L
    DEYO, R
    [J]. SPINE, 1992, 17 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [42] Effectiveness of dynamic muscle training, relaxation training, or ordinary activity for chronic neck pain: randomised controlled trial
    Viljanen, M
    Malmivaara, A
    Uitti, J
    Rinne, M
    Palmroos, R
    Laippala, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7413): : 475 - 477
  • [43] Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Four-Year Results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial
    Weinstein, James N.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Tosteson, Anna
    Blood, Emily
    Herkowitz, Harry
    Cammisa, Frank
    Albert, Todd
    Boden, Scott D.
    Hilibrand, Alan
    Goldberg, Harley
    Berven, Sigurd
    An, Howard
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (14) : 1329 - 1338
  • [44] A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis - A randomized clinical trial
    Whitman, Julie M.
    Flynn, Timothy W.
    Childs, John D.
    Wainner, Robert S.
    Gill, Howard E.
    Ryder, Michael G.
    Garber, Matthew B.
    Bennett, Andrew C.
    Fritz, Julie M.
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (22) : 2541 - 2549