Dissociation between striatal regions while learning to categorize via feedback and via observation

被引:83
作者
Cincotta, Corinna M. [1 ]
Seger, Carol A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.249
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Convergent evidence from functional imaging and from neuropsychological studies of basal ganglia disorders indicates that the striatum is involved in learning to categorize visual stimuli with feedback. However, it is unclear which cognitive process of processes involved in categorization is or are responsible for striatum have been linked to feedback processing and to aquisition of stimulus-category associations. We examined the effect of the presence of feedback during learning on striatal recruitment by comparing feedback learning with observational learning of an information integration task. In the feedback task, participants were shown a stimulus, made a button press response, and then recieved feedback as to whether they had made the correct response. In the observational task, participants were given the category label before the stimulus appeared and then made a button press indicating the correct category membership. A region-of-interest analysis was used to examine activity in three regions of the striatum: the head of the caudate, body and tail of the caudate, and the putamen. Activity in the left head of the caudate was modulated by the presence of feedback: The magnitude of activation change was greater during feedback learning than during observational learning. In contrast, the bilateral body and tail of the caudate and the putamen were active to a similar degree in both feedback and observational learning. This pattern of results supports a functional dissociation between regions of the striatum, such that the head of the caudate is involved in feedback processing, whereas the body and tail of the caudate and the putamen are involved in learning stimulus-category associations. The hippocampus was active bilaterally during both feedback and observational learning, indicating potential parallel involvement with the striatum in information integration category learning.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 265
页数:17
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning
    Aron, AR
    Shohamy, D
    Clark, J
    Myers, C
    Gluck, MA
    Poldrack, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 92 (02) : 1144 - 1152
  • [2] Long-term test-retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task
    Aron, AR
    Gluck, MA
    Poldrack, RA
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 29 (03) : 1000 - 1006
  • [3] A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning
    Ashby, FG
    Alfonso-Reese, LA
    Turken, AU
    Waldron, EM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (03) : 442 - 481
  • [4] Category learning deficits in Parkinson's disease
    Ashby, FG
    Noble, S
    Filoteo, J
    Waldron, EM
    Ell, SW
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 17 (01) : 115 - 124
  • [5] Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning
    Ashby, FG
    Maddox, WT
    Bohil, CJ
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2002, 30 (05) : 666 - 677
  • [6] On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization
    Ashby, FG
    Queller, S
    Berretty, PM
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (06): : 1178 - 1199
  • [7] Ashby FG., 2003, ATTENTION IMPLICIT L, V48, P109, DOI DOI 10.1075/AICR.48.09ASH
  • [8] Typical and atypical antipsychotic medications differentially affect two nondeclarative memory tasks in schizophrenic patients: a double dissociation
    Beninger, RJ
    Wasserman, J
    Zanibbi, K
    Charbonneau, D
    Mangels, J
    Beninger, BV
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2003, 61 (2-3) : 281 - 292
  • [9] Frontal networks for learning and executing arbitrary stimulus - Response associations
    Boettiger, CA
    D'Esposito, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 25 (10) : 2723 - 2732
  • [10] Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE
    Buffalo, EA
    Ramus, SJ
    Clark, RE
    Teng, E
    Squire, LR
    Zola, SM
    [J]. LEARNING & MEMORY, 1999, 6 (06) : 572 - 599