Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review

被引:132
作者
Tocci, Lorenzo [1 ,2 ]
Pal, Tamas [2 ,3 ]
Pesmazoglou, Ioannis [2 ]
Franchetti, Benjamin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] Entropea Labs, 2a Greenwood Rd, London E8 1AB, England
[3] KTH Ind & Engn Management, Dept Energy Technol, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
ENERGIES | 2017年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) review; working fluid selection; expander selection; mini-ORC; ORC survey; WASTE HEAT-RECOVERY; MULTI-VANE EXPANDERS; MICRO-CHP SYSTEMS; LOW-GRADE HEAT; WORKING FLUIDS; THERMOECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; SCREW EXPANDER; POWER-PLANTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/en10040413
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) is widely considered as a promising technology to produce electrical power output from low-grade thermal sources. In the last decade, several power plants have been installed worldwide in the MW range. However, despite its market potential, the commercialization of ORC power plants in the kW range did not reach a high level of maturity, for several reasons. Firstly, the specific price is still too high to offer an attractive payback period, and secondly, potential costumers for small-scale ORCs are typically SMEs (Small-Medium Enterprises), generally less aware of the potential savings this technology could lead to. When it comes to small-scale plants, additional design issues arise that still limit the widespread availability of the technology. This review paper presents the state of the art of the technology, from a technical and economic perspective. Working fluid selection and expander design are illustrated in detail, as they represent the bottleneck of the ORC technology for small-scale power production. In addition, a European market analysis is presented, which constitutes a useful instrument to understand the future evolution of the technology.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 89 条
[11]   A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle [J].
Bao, Junjiang ;
Zhao, Li .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 :325-342
[12]   Experimental and Thermoeconomic Analysis of Small-Scale Solar Organic Rankine Cycle (SORC) System [J].
Baral, Suresh ;
Kim, Dokyun ;
Yun, Eunkoo ;
Kim, Kyung Chun .
ENTROPY, 2015, 17 (04) :2039-2061
[13]   Waste heat recovery from a diesel engine using shell and tube heat exchanger [J].
Bari, Saiful ;
Hossain, Shekh N. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 61 (02) :355-363
[14]  
Borisavljevic A., 2013, LIMITS MODELING DESI, P13
[15]   Feasibility analysis of a small-scale ORC energy recovery system for vehicular application [J].
Capata, Roberto ;
Toro, Claudia .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 86 :1078-1090
[16]   Techno-economic feasibility study of the integration of a commercial small-scale ORC in a real case study [J].
Cavazzini, G. ;
Dal Toso, P. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 99 :161-175
[17]   Experimental study on low-temperature organic Rankine cycle utilizing scroll type expander [J].
Chang, Jen-Chieh ;
Hung, Tzu-Chen ;
He, Ya-Ling ;
Zhang, Wenping .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 155 :150-159
[18]   A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat [J].
Chen, Huijuan ;
Goswami, D. Yogi ;
Stefanakos, Elias K. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (09) :3059-3067
[19]  
Clean Power, CLEAN POW
[20]   Predicting the optimum design of single stage axial expanders in ORC systems: Is there a single efficiency map for different working fluids? [J].
Da Lio, Luca ;
Manente, Giovanni ;
Lazzaretto, Andrea .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 167 :44-58