Derivative-free generation and interpolation of convex Pareto optimal IMRT plans

被引:40
作者
Hoffmann, Aswin L.
D Siem, Alex Y.
den Hertog, Dick
Kaanders, Johannes H. A. M.
Huizenga, Henk
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, CentER, Dept Econometr & Operat Res, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/005
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In inverse treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), beamlet intensity levels in fluence maps of high-energy photon beams are optimized. Treatment plan evaluation criteria are used as objective functions to steer the optimization process. Fluence map optimization can be considered a multi-objective optimization problem, for which a set of Pareto optimal solutions exists: the Pareto efficient frontier (PEF). In this paper, a constrained optimization method is pursued to iteratively estimate the PEF up to some predefined error. We use the property that the PEF is convex for a convex optimization problem to construct piecewise-linear upper and lower bounds to approximate the PEF from a small initial set of Pareto optimal plans. A derivative-free Sandwich algorithm is presented in which these bounds are used with three strategies to determine the location of the next Pareto optimal solution such that the uncertainty in the estimated PEF is maximally reduced. We show that an intelligent initial solution for a new Pareto optimal plan can be obtained by interpolation of fluence maps from neighbouring Pareto optimal plans. The method has been applied to a simplified clinical test case using two convex objective functions to map the trade-off between tumour dose heterogeneity and critical organ sparing. All three strategies produce representative estimates of the PEF. The new algorithm is particularly suitable for dynamic generation of Pareto optimal plans in interactive treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页码:6349 / 6369
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Tools for the analysis of dose optimization:: II.: Sensitivity analysis [J].
Alber, M ;
Birkner, M ;
Nüsslin, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (19) :N265-N270
[2]   Physician/patient-driven risk assignment in radiation oncology: Reality or fancy? [J].
Amols, HI ;
Zaider, M ;
Hayes, MK ;
Schiff, PB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (03) :455-461
[3]  
BORTFELD T, 1995, THESIS R CAROLA U HE
[4]  
Boyd S., 2004, CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
[5]  
BRAHME A, 1995, RAD THERAPY PHYSICS, P209
[6]   SANDWICH APPROXIMATION OF UNIVARIATE CONVEX-FUNCTIONS WITH AN APPLICATION TO SEPARABLE CONVEX-PROGRAMMING [J].
BURKARD, RE ;
HAMACHER, HW ;
ROTE, G .
NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 1991, 38 (06) :911-924
[7]  
CHANKONG V, 1983, LARGE SCALE SYST, V5, P1
[8]  
Chankong V., 1983, Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology
[9]   The generalized equivalent uniform dose function as a basis for intensity-modulated treatment planning [J].
Choi, B ;
Deasy, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (20) :3579-3589
[10]   Exploration of tradeoffs in intensity-modulated radiotherapy [J].
Craft, D ;
Halabi, T ;
Bortfeld, T .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (24) :5857-5868