Temporal and spatial pattern of expression of the pea phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene1 promoter in transgenic tobacco

被引:16
作者
Kawamata, S
Shimoharai, K
Imura, Y
Ozaki, M
Ichinose, Y
Shiraishi, T
Kunoh, H
Yamada, T
机构
[1] OKAYAMA UNIV,COLL AGR,LAB PLANT PATHOL & GENET ENGN,OKAYAMA 790,JAPAN
[2] MIE UNIV,COLL BIOL RESOURCES,TSU,MIE 514,JAPAN
关键词
GUS reporter gene; phenylalanine ammonialyase (EC 4.3.1.5); Phytophthora capsici; Phytophthora nicotiana; Pisum sativum; promoter activity;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029237
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Genes encoding phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) form a small multigene family with at least three members in pea. Tissue-specific expression of the promoter of a member of PAL gene family (PSPAL1) was investigated in the transgenic tobacco transformants carrying the different modes of chimeric fusion between the PSPAL1 promoter and a bacterial beta-glucuronidase (GUS) gene. In stems, at least, strict correlation was found between steady-state levels of Gus-mRNA and enzyme activity. Significantly high level of GUS activity was observed in roots, particularly in meristematic tissues and the pigmented region of petals of transgenic tobacco carrying the translational fusion type B (-1,394 to +140 of PSPAL1 connected to Gus), followed by moderately high level of GUS activity carrying the translational fusion type A(-1,394 to +117). GUS expression in tissues of mature leaves, however, was very low in these constructs. Extremely low GUS activity was observed in the transformants of transcriptional fusion type (-1,394 to +5), whilst no activity was detected carrying non-transcription fusion type (-1,394 to -27). Furthermore, the pattern of the PSPAL1 expression was characterized in response to pathogen ingress and woundings in transgenic tobacco carrying the translational fusion type B. Woundings itself triggered marked expression of PSPAL1-driven GUS expression at the wounded sites. Inoculation of nonpathogens, Phytophthora capsici, P. boehmeriae and Erisiphe graminis f. sp. hordei, both caused rapid and very clear GUS expression zone along with the development of hypersensitive cell death area where callose was accumulated, however, the inoculation of a pathogen, P. nicotiana caused slow and hazy GUS expression zone along with the lesion development. These results suggest that the expression of pea PSPAL1 promoter is regulated in a similar fashion, at least in a part, in pea and transgenic tobacco, under the plant development and various environmental cues.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 803
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] ORGANIZATION OF THE GENES ENCODING CHALCONE SYNTHASE IN PISUM-SATIVUM
    AN, C
    ICHINOSE, Y
    YAMADA, T
    TANAKA, Y
    SHIRAISHI, T
    OKU, H
    [J]. PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 21 (05) : 789 - 803
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1962, ANATOMY SEED PLANTS
  • [3] Ausubel FA, 1995, CURRENT PROTOCOLS MO
  • [4] BINARY AGROBACTERIUM VECTORS FOR PLANT TRANSFORMATION
    BEVAN, M
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1984, 12 (22) : 8711 - 8721
  • [5] TISSUE-SPECIFIC AND CELL-SPECIFIC ACTIVITY OF A PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE PROMOTER IN TRANSGENIC PLANTS
    BEVAN, M
    SHUFFLEBOTTOM, D
    EDWARDS, K
    JEFFERSON, R
    SCHUCH, W
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 1989, 8 (07) : 1899 - 1906
  • [6] BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
  • [7] PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE GENE ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
    CRAMER, CL
    EDWARDS, K
    DRON, M
    LIANG, XW
    DILDINE, SL
    BOLWELL, GP
    DIXON, RA
    LAMB, CJ
    SCHUCH, W
    [J]. PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1989, 12 (04) : 367 - 383
  • [8] EXONIC SEQUENCES ARE REQUIRED FOR ELICITOR AND LIGHT ACTIVATION OF A PLANT DEFENSE GENE, BUT PROMOTER SEQUENCES ARE SUFFICIENT FOR TISSUE SPECIFIC EXPRESSION
    DOUGLAS, CJ
    HAUFFE, KD
    ITESMORALES, ME
    ELLARD, M
    PASZKOWSKI, U
    HAHLBROCK, K
    DANGL, JL
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 1991, 10 (07) : 1767 - 1775
  • [9] ESCHRICH W., 1964, STAIN TECHNOL, V39, P303
  • [10] FUJIWARA M, 1986, Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, V52, P330, DOI 10.3186/jjphytopath.52.330