Management of Type II Endoleaks: Preoperative versus Postoperative versus Expectant Management

被引:47
作者
Jonker, Frederik H. W.
Aruny, John
Muhs, Bart E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Vasc Surg Sect, Dept Surg, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS; INFERIOR MESENTERIC-ARTERY; ENDOVASCULAR AAA REPAIR; GUIDED THROMBIN INJECTION; SIDE BRANCH ENDOLEAKS; COIL EMBOLIZATION; RISK-FACTORS; STENT-GRAFT; EUROSTAR EXPERIENCE; TRANSCAVAL APPROACH;
D O I
10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2009.07.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Type II endoleak is a common phenomenon after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Most type II endoleaks are innocuous and transient and therefore do not require intervention. However, particularly persistent endoleaks could lead to aneurysm enlargement and delayed aortic rupture. Decreasing the occurrence rates of type II endoleaks can be attempted with prophylactic occlusion of the inferior mesenteric, hypogastric, and lumbar arteries. Although the efficacy and clinical benefit of prophylactic occlusion of aortic branches prior to EVAR or during the endovascular repair remain controversial, we anticipate an increased use of intraoperative embolization techniques. A reasonable treatment strategy in patients with type II endoleak may be to intervene in cases of increasing aneurysm size or if the endoleak does not resolve spontaneously within 6 months. Translumbar embolization has been shown to be more effective than transarterial embolization. An alternative embolization technique is transcaval embolization, which has shown success rates comparable to translumbar embolization. Type II endoleaks can also be treated during laparoscopy or laparotomy, but these techniques are more invasive and should be used only after failure of embolization techniques. Semin Vasc Surg 22:165-171 (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 69 条
[61]   Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up [J].
van Marrewijk, CJ ;
Fransen, G ;
Laheij, RJF ;
Harris, PL ;
Buth, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 27 (02) :128-137
[62]   Relationship between preoperative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery and subsequent occurrence of type II endoleak in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Velazquez, OC ;
Baum, RA ;
Carpenter, JP ;
Golden, MA ;
Cohn, M ;
Pyeron, A ;
Barker, CF ;
Criado, FJ ;
Fairman, RM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (04) :777-788
[63]  
Walker SR, 1999, J ENDOVASC SURG, V6, P350, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0350:EARPOS>2.0.CO
[64]  
2
[65]   Risk factors for type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Warrier, Ranjana ;
Miller, Robert ;
Bond, Rick ;
Robertson, Ian K. ;
Hewitt, Peter ;
Scott, Alan .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 78 (1-2) :61-63
[66]  
Wisselink W, 2000, J VASC SURG, V31, P1240, DOI 10.1067/mva.2000.105007
[67]  
Zanchetta M, 2007, J ENDOVASC THER, V14, P176, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14[176:IITITP]2.0.CO
[68]  
2
[69]   IMA clipping for a type II endoleak: Combined laparoscopic and endovascular approach [J].
Zhou, Wei ;
Lumsden, Alan B. ;
Li, James .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (04) :272-275