Measuring Spatial Influence of Twitter Users by Interactions

被引:3
|
作者
Wei, Hong [1 ]
Sankaranarayanan, Jagan [2 ]
Samet, Hanan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Comp Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, UMIACS, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 1ST ACM SIGSPATIAL WORKSHOP ON ANALYTICS FOR LOCAL EVENTS AND NEWS (LENS 2017) | 2015年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Spatial Influence; Interaction Graph; Spatial Locality; PageRank; Twitter; Social Network; News Seeders; Local News;
D O I
10.1145/3148044.3148046
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The three ways of interactions in Twitter-retweet, reply, and mention-comprise of a latent dynamic information flow network between users, which can be utilized to determine influential users. This paper focuses on determining which Twitter users have great influence on a query location Q in the sense that they are assumed to provide information that is of sufficient interest to prompt people at Q to interact with them. Note that an influential Twitter user who is of great influence on Q may not be necessarily from Q. Therefore, we first define generalized influential Twitter users regardless of whether their location was known or not, meaning that such generalized influencers on Q can be either from inside Q, or outside Q, or even unknown. A more interesting subset of generalized influencers is the ones whose location is in Q, and termed as local influential Twitter users. One potential application of finding local influencers (e.g., local news media) is to detect local events by tracking their tweets. Using a large amount of data collected from Twitter, we first build a large-scale directed interaction graph of Twitter users and present an analysis of the geographical characteristics of the edges in this interaction graph and make several interesting observations. Based on these findings, we propose two versions of PageRank that measure spatial influence on the interaction graph: Edge-Local PageRank (ELPR), and Source-Vertex-Locality PageRank (SVLPR), which takes into account the spatial locality of edges and the spatial locality of source vertices in edges, respectively. In addition, a Geographical PageRank (GPR) is also proposed trying to incorporate both of these two factors together. In the experimental evaluation, we examine the effectiveness of the proposed methods with regards to 3 different US cities "Boston, MA", "Bristol, CT" and "Seattle, WA", and the results show that our algorithms outperform their baseline approaches including the topological network metrics and the original PageRank. In addition, we also explored the possibility of using local influential Twitter users as potential news seeders and showed that some types of influential users have high credibility in outputting local place-relevant tweets.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting Attitude and Actions of Twitter Users
    Mahmud, Jalal
    Fei, Geli
    Xu, Anbang
    Pal, Aditya
    Zhou, Michelle
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES (IUI'16), 2016, : 2 - 6
  • [32] Understanding government social media users: an analysis of interactions on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada Twitter and Facebook
    Gintova, Maria
    GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2019, 36 (04)
  • [33] Measuring the impact of spammers on e-mail and Twitter networks
    Colladon, Andrea Fronzetti
    Gloor, Peter A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 48 : 254 - 262
  • [34] New literacies practices of teenage Twitter users
    Gleason, Benjamin
    LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 41 (01) : 31 - 54
  • [35] An Analytical Model for Identifying Suspected Users on Twitter
    Singh, Monika
    Singh, Amardeep
    Bansal, Divya
    Sofat, Sanjeev
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 50 (04) : 383 - 404
  • [36] Features combination for gender recognition on Twitter users
    Fernandez, Daniela
    Moctezuma, Daniela
    Siordia, Oscar S.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL AUTUMN MEETING ON POWER, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTING (ROPEC), 2016,
  • [37] Confidence Index Analysis of Twitter Users Timeline
    Is, Hafzullah
    Tuncer, Taner
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP), 2018,
  • [38] Seeing and Believing: Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Twitter Users
    Khan, Tanveer
    Michalas, Antonis
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 110505 - 110516
  • [39] TSim: a system for discovering similar users on Twitter
    AlMahmoud, Hind
    AlKhalifa, Shurug
    JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2018, 5 (01)
  • [40] Analysing the connectivity and communication of suicidal users on twitter
    Colombo, Gualtiero B.
    Burnap, Pete
    Hodorog, Andrei
    Scourfield, Jonathan
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 73 : 291 - 300