Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detecting the staging and grading of bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
作者
Ge, Xin-Yue [1 ,2 ]
Lan, Zhong-Kai [3 ]
Chen, Jing [2 ]
Zhu, Shang-Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Med Ultrasound, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 4, Dept Med Ultrasound, Liuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Med Univ, Liuzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Med Ultrasound, Liuzhou, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
urinary bladder neoplasms; bladder cancer; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; meta-analysis; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST ACCURACY; UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; PUBLICATION; PERFORMANCE; NEOPLASMS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.11152/mu-2730
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Aim: The study retrospectively analysed the accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating stage Ta-T1 or low-grade bladder cancer (BC) from stage T2 or high-grade bladder cancer. Material and methods: We systematically searched the literature indexed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for original diagnostic articles of bladder cancer. The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS was compared with cystoscopy and/or transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT). The bivariate logistic regression model was used for data pooling, couple forest plot., diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC). Results: Five studies met the selection criteria; the overall number of reported bladder cancers patients were 436. The pooled-sensitivity (P-SIN), pooled-specificity (P-SPE), pooled-positive likelihood ratio (PER+), pooled-negative likelihood ratio (PLR-), DOR, and area under the SROC curve were 94.0% (95%CI: 85%-98%), 90% (95%CI: 83%-95%), 9.5 (95%CI: 5.1-17.6), 0.06 (95%CI: 0.02-0.17), 147 (95%CI: 35-612) and 97% (95% CI: 95%-98%) respectively. Conclusion: CEUS reaches a high efficiency in discriminating Ta-T1 or low-grade bladder cancer from stage T2 or high-grade bladder cancer. It can be a promising method in patients to distinguish T staging and grading of bladder cancer because of its high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[2]   Bladder Tumor Staging: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced and Gray-Scale Ultrasound [J].
Caruso, Giuseppe ;
Salvaggio, Giuseppe ;
Campisi, Antonella ;
Melloni, Darwin ;
Midiri, Massimo ;
Bertolotto, Michele ;
Lagalla, Roberto .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (01) :151-156
[3]   Recurrence of high-risk bladder cancer: A population-based analysis [J].
Chamie, Karim ;
Litwin, Mark S. ;
Bassett, Jeffrey C. ;
Daskivich, Timothy J. ;
Lai, Julie ;
Hanley, Jan M. ;
Konety, Badrinath R. ;
Saigal, Christopher S. .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (17) :3219-3227
[4]   The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J].
Deeks, JJ ;
Macaskill, P ;
Irwig, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) :882-893
[5]  
Drudi F M, 2012, J Ultrasound, V15, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.jus.2012.09.002
[6]   Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for tumour staging of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Gandhi, Niket ;
Krishna, Satheesh ;
Booth, Christopher M. ;
Breau, Rodney H. ;
Flood, Trevor A. ;
Morgan, Scott C. ;
Schieda, Nicola ;
Salameh, Jean-Paul ;
McGrath, Trevor A. ;
McInnes, Matthew D. F. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (05) :744-753
[7]   Oncological Outcome of Primary and Secondary Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Ge, Peng ;
Wang, Li ;
Lu, Meng ;
Mao, Lijun ;
Li, Wang ;
Wen, Rumin ;
Lin, Jian ;
Wang, Junqi ;
Chen, Jiacun .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
[8]   Contrast enhanced ultrasound in urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder: An underutilized staging and grading modality [J].
Gupta, Vijayant Govinda ;
Kumar, Santosh ;
Singh, Shrawan Kumar ;
Lal, Anupam ;
Kakkar, Nandita .
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (04) :360-365
[9]   Evidence-based practice in radiology: Steps 3 and 4 - Appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analyses [J].
Halligan, Steve ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) :13-27
[10]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560