Sensitivity of 1-D ground motion predictions to analysis codes and material models using KiK-net vertical arrays

被引:8
作者
Meite, Romain [1 ]
Wotherspoon, Liam [1 ]
Kaklamanos, James [2 ]
McGann, Christopher R. [3 ]
Hayden, Connor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Engn Block 1,Bldg 401,20 Symonds St, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
[2] Merrimack Coll, Dept Civil Engn, 315 Turnpike St, N Andover, MA 01845 USA
[3] Univ Canterbury, Dept Civil & Nat Resources Engn, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
SITE-RESPONSE ANALYSES; SHEAR MODULUS; FORMULATION; STIFFNESS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106113
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
One-dimensional (1-D) ground response analysis (GRA) predictions are highly sensitive to the analysis methods and dynamic soil models employed, contributing to significant scatter in analysis outputs. In this paper, a parametric study of 1-D GRA is conducted to evaluate the performance of various models using 60 ground motion records of varying intensity from five Kiban-Kyoshin (KiK-net) downhole array stations in Japan. Four GRA codes are considered, including the equivalent-linear (EL) method, a modified EL method using frequency-dependent soil parameters (FDEL), and two nonlinear (NL) models computed in OpenSees and DEEPSOIL. The soil constitutive models are constrained using a set of five material curves representing a wide range of nonlinear soil behaviour. It was found that all models are sensitive to the material curves at high frequencies, and the NL models are highly sensitive to the parametrization of Rayleigh damping. As the levels of soil nonlinearity increase, all GRA methods tend to over-damp the higher frequency content of ground motions, with substantial discrepancies across the model predictions. Interestingly, the FDEL method displays a lower sensitivity to material curves and reduces the biases at high frequencies. The results of this study suggest that GRA codes and material curves contribute evenly to the overall dispersion when simulating strong ground motions. To quantify the variability of GRA models, along with the epistemic uncertainties, a linear regression relationship in bi-logarithmic space is established across all records between the total standard deviation and the shear strains developed within the soil profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Insights from California Vertical Arrays on the Effectiveness of Ground Response Analysis with Alternative Damping Models [J].
Afshari, Kioumars ;
Stewart, Jonathan P. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (04) :1250-1264
[2]  
Amir-Faryar B, 2017, GEOMECH GEOENGIN, V12, P60, DOI 10.1080/17486025.2016.1162332
[3]   Selection of representative shear modulus reduction and damping curves for rock, gravel and sand sites from the KiK-Net downhole array [J].
Anbazhagan, P. ;
Prabhakaran, Athul ;
Madhura, H. ;
Moustafa, Sayed S. R. ;
Al-Arifi, Nassir S. N. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2017, 88 (03) :1741-1768
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Rep. No. EERC/7212
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Geotechnical earthquake engineering
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ELECT POWER RES I, P1
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, SHAKE91: A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits
[8]  
[Anonymous], P 2 PAN AM C SOIL ME
[9]  
Aoi S, 2000, SEISMOL RES LETT, P72
[10]   Soil amplification with a strong impedance contrast: Boston, Massachusetts [J].
Baise, Laurie G. ;
Kaklamanos, James ;
Berry, Bradford M. ;
Thompson, Eric M. .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2016, 202 :1-13