Lithography manufacturing implementation for 65mn and 45nm nodes with model-based scattering bars using IML™ technology

被引:1
作者
Hsu, N [1 ]
Van Den Broeke, D [1 ]
Laidig, T [1 ]
Wampler, KE [1 ]
Hollerbach, U [1 ]
Socha, R [1 ]
Chen, JF [1 ]
Hsu, S [1 ]
Shi, XL [1 ]
机构
[1] ASML MaskTools Inc, Santa Clara, CA USA
来源
Optical Microlithography XVIII, Pts 1-3 | 2005年 / 5754卷
关键词
scattering bars; SB; model-based SB; CPL; diffraction optical element; DOE; IML technology; LithoCruiser (TM); MaskWeaver (TM); SLiC (TM);
D O I
10.1117/12.598589
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Scattering Bars (SB) OPC, together with optimized illumination, is no doubt one of the critical enablers for low k(1), lithography manufacturing.([1]) The manufacturing implementation of SB so far has been mainly based on rule-based approach. While this has been working well, a more effective model-based approach is much more desired lithographically for manufacturing at 65nm and 45nm nodes. This is necessary to ensure sufficient process margin using hyper NA for patterning random IC design. In our model-based SB (M-SB) OPC implementation, we have based on the patented IML (TM) Technology from ASML Mask Tools.([2,3]) In this report, we use both dark field contact hole and clear field poly gate mask to demonstrate this implementation methodology. It is also quite applicable for dark field trench masks, such as local interconnect mask with damascene metal. For our full-chip implementation flow, the first step is to determine the critical design area and then to proceed with NA and illumination optimization. We show that, using LithoCruiser (TM), we are able to select the best NA in combination with optimum illumination via a Diffraction Optical Element (DOE). The decision to use a custom DOE or one from the available DOE library from ASML can be made based on predicted process performance and cost effectiveness. With optimized illumination, it is now possible for MaskWeaver (TM) to construct an interference map for the full-chip mask pattern. Utilizing the interference map, M-SB OPC is generated. Next, model OPC can be applied with the presence of M-SB for the entire chip. It is important to note here, that from our experience, the model OPC must be calibrated with the presence of SB in order to achieve the desired accuracy. We report the full-chip processing benchmark using MaskWeaver (TM) to apply both M-SB and model OPC. For actual patterning performance, we have verified the full chip OPC treatment using SLiC (TM), a DFM tool from Cadence. This implementation methodology can be applied to binary chrome mask, attenuated PSM, and CPL.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 367
页数:13
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Contact hole reticle optimization by using interference mapping lithography (IML™)
    Socha, R
    Van Den Broeke, D
    Hsu, S
    Chen, JF
    Laidig, T
    Corcoran, N
    Hollerbach, U
    Wampler, KE
    Shi, XL
    Conley, W
    [J]. PHOTOMASK AND NEXT GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XI, 2004, 5446 : 516 - 534
  • [2] Application of CPL with Interference Mapping Lithography™ to generate random contact reticle designs for the 65nm node
    Van Den Broeke, D
    Laidig, T
    Chen, JF
    Wampler, K
    Hsu, S
    Shi, XL
    Socha, R
    Dusa, M
    Corcoran, N
    [J]. PHOTOMASK AND NEXT GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XI, 2004, 5446 : 550 - 559
  • [3] VANDENBROEKE D, 2003, SPIE, V5256, P297
  • [4] Through pitch low-k1 contact hole imaging with CPL™ technology
    Wiaux, V
    Bekaert, J
    Chen, JF
    Hsu, S
    Ronse, K
    Socha, R
    Vandenberghe, G
    Van Den Broeke, D
    [J]. PHOTOMASK AND NEXT GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XI, 2004, 5446 : 585 - 594