An intelligent framework for productivity assessment and analysis of human resource from resilience engineering, motivational factors, HSE and ergonomics perspectives

被引:51
作者
Azadeh, Ali [1 ]
Zarrin, Mansour [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Productivity assessment; Human resource management; Resilience engineering; Work motivational factors; Health; safety; environment and ergonomics (HSEE); Evolutionary methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Human resource management (HRM) is the description of formal systems planned for the manpower management in a company. HRM aims to maximize organizational productivity by optimizing efficiency and effectiveness of its personnel. This paper presents an intelligent framework for productivity assessment and analysis of human resource in a large petrochemical plant. The efficiency and effectiveness of this company's staff are evaluated by considering three concepts including resilience engineering (RE), motivational factors in the work environment and health, safety, environment and ergonomics (HSEE). The framework is based on using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for calculating efficiency and one of the well-known Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), namely Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) besides an Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) trained by two evolutionary methods; particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) for evaluating effectiveness of the company's workforce. Then, the productivity of staff (which is the sum of efficiency and effectiveness) is analyzed to determine the unproductive staff as well as the impact degree of each concept on efficiency and effectiveness. The proposed framework can provide considerable benefits to safety-critical systems, managers and staff e.g., identifying key factors significantly affecting the productivity of HRM. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 71
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Azadeh A., Bonab N.A., Salehi V., Zarrin M., A unique algorithm for the assessment and improvement of job satisfaction by resilience engineering: hazardous labs, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 49, pp. 68-77, (2015)
  • [2] Azadeh A., Mokhtari Z., Sharahi Z.J., Zarrin M., An integrated experiment for identification of best decision styles and teamworks with respect to HSE and ergonomics program: the case of a large oil refinery, Accid. Anal. Prev., 85, pp. 30-44, (2015)
  • [3] Azadeh A., Mousavi Ahranjani P., The impact of job security, satisfaction and stress on performance assessment and optimization of generation companies, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 32, pp. 343-348, (2014)
  • [4] Azadeh A., Saberi M., Rouzbahman M., Saberi Z., An intelligent algorithm for performance evaluation of job stress and HSE factors in petrochemical plants with noise and uncertainty, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 26, 1, pp. 140-152, (2013)
  • [5] Azadeh A., Salehi V., Ashjari B., Saberi M., Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis: the case of a petrochemical plant, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 92, 3, pp. 231-241, (2014)
  • [6] Azadeh A., Zarrin M., Evaluating the impacts of resilience engineering on HSE and ergonomics factors by Z-number cognitive map in a large petrochemical plant, Safety Health Work, pp. 1-12, (2015)
  • [7] Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Manage. Sci., 30, 9, pp. 1078-1092, (1984)
  • [8] Banker R.D., Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Thrall R.M., Zhu J., Returns to scale in different DEA models, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 154, 2, pp. 345-362, (2004)
  • [9] Berry L.M., Houston J.P., Psychology at Work, (1993)
  • [10] Bland J.M., Altman D.G., Statistics notes: cronbach's alpha, BMJ, 314, 7080, (1997)