On the validity of longitudinal comparisons of central location consumer testing results prior to COVID-19 versus home use testing data during the pandemic

被引:9
作者
Shi, Menghan [1 ]
Stelick, Alina [1 ]
Licker, Susan [1 ]
Dando, Robin [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Food Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
affect; consumer testing; COVID-19; sensory liking; TASTE PERCEPTION; FOOD CHOICE; STRESS; SLEEP; PANEL; ACCEPTABILITY; COMPUTERS; CONTEXT; LABEL;
D O I
10.1111/1750-3841.15905
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Consumer testing assays a panel's liking of a food or other sensory stimulus. However, liking can be influenced by mood, with people feeling more uncomfortable, or more unhappy reporting lower liking ratings than those in a higher affect. Though consumer testing typically takes place as a central location test (CLT, usually in a set of standardized sensory booths), the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global pivot to home use tests (HUTs), where panelists can taste and smell samples unmasked more safely while in their own homes. Unfortunately, as this situation differs in many ways to a central location test, this puts the validity of longitudinal comparisons of liking scores under question. Further, as people across the globe report feelings of worry, unease, and stress during the pandemic, this may present a second source of variation in affect with previous years. We tested a set of snack bar samples both at home and in a central location, in repeated measures with the same panel, to test the validity of comparisons across locations. We further compared CLT results to those when testing the same samples in a previous year. Finally, we performed a meta-analysis of existing data on this subject. While liking behavior in CLTs did not differ between years, panelists rated some samples higher when in their own homes, in line with results from the meta-analysis of previous reports. Interestingly, panelists in the study also assigned fewer penalties in the HUT, implying a less analytical mindset when in the home. Results suggest that care should be taken when comparing results taken at home during the COVID-19 pandemic to those taken previously in a central location. Practical Application Consumer testing is applied in the food industry to evaluate a panelist's liking for a food product or stimulus. However, liking is also dependent on factors extrinsic to the samples tested. Thus, with the switch to in-home testing due to COVID-19, we compared liking scores from in-home and central locations testing, with higher scores common in HUTs.
引用
收藏
页码:4668 / 4677
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   TASTE AND SMELL PERCEPTION IN DEPRESSION [J].
AMSTERDAM, JD ;
SETTLE, RG ;
DOTY, RL ;
ABELMAN, E ;
WINOKUR, A .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1987, 22 (12) :1481-1485
[2]   Estimation in meta-analyses of mean difference and standardized mean difference [J].
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas ;
Hoaglin, David C. ;
Kulinskaya, Elena .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (02) :171-191
[3]   Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion [J].
Boutrolle, I ;
Arranz, D ;
Rogeaux, M ;
Delarue, J .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2005, 16 (08) :704-713
[4]  
Boutrolle I, 2009, WOODHEAD PUBL FOOD S, P128, DOI 10.1533/9781845695712.3.128
[5]   Central location test vs. home use test:: Contrasting results depending on product type [J].
Boutrolle, Isabelle ;
Delarue, Julien ;
Arranz, Delphine ;
Rogeaux, Michel ;
Koster, Egon Peter .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :490-499
[6]  
Chandler J., 2019, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, VVolume 4, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119536604
[7]   INFLUENCE OF LABEL AND LOCATION OF TESTING ON ACCEPTABILITY OF CREAM CHEESE VARYING IN FAT-CONTENT [J].
DAILLANTSPINNLER, B ;
ISSANCHOU, S .
APPETITE, 1995, 24 (02) :101-105
[8]   Comparing Survey Results Obtained via Mobile Devices and Computers: An Experiment With a Mobile Web Survey on a Heterogeneous Group of Mobile Devices Versus a Computer-Assisted Web Survey [J].
de Bruijne, Marika ;
Wijnant, Arnaud .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2013, 31 (04) :482-504
[9]  
Delarue J, 2010, WOODHEAD PUBL FOOD S, P175, DOI 10.1533/9781845699970.2.175
[10]  
Eggert J, 1986, ASTM PUBLICATION COD